Decoding the Thermodynamics Graph
Work vs Volume
Graphs in thermodynamics aren't just arbitrary lines drawn on a grid; they are visual stories of physical processes. When you are asked to identify the correct graph for a process, you are essentially being asked to translate a physical law into the language of coordinate geometry. Let's break down this problem step-by-step and see how the math perfectly dictates the shape of the graph.
The Master Equation
We are dealing with the reversible isothermal expansion of an ideal gas. The fundamental equation for the work done in this process is:
The question specifically asks us to plot the magnitude of the work done, ∣W∣, against the natural logarithm of the final volume, lnV. Let's take the absolute value to make our expression positive (since Vf>Vi in expansion, the logarithm is positive, and the negative sign makes W negative by IUPAC convention):
Using the fundamental properties of logarithms, we can expand this fraction into a subtraction:
The Geometry of Thermodynamics
Now, look closely at our expanded equation. It has the exact same structural DNA as the classic equation of a straight line:
By mapping our variables, we get:
y-axis (y): ∣W∣
x-axis (x): lnV
Slope (m): nRT
y-intercept (c): −nRTlnVi
This mapping is our golden key. It tells us that the graph must be a straight line. But we have two different temperatures, T1 and T2, where T1<T2. How does this affect the lines?
1. Analyzing the Slope:
The slope m is directly proportional to the temperature T. Since T2>T1, the slope for the T2 process must be greater than the slope for the T1 process (m2>m1). Visually, this means the line for T2 will be steeper. All four given options show T2 as steeper, so we need to dig deeper.
2. Analyzing the Intercepts:
Let's find the x-intercept. The x-intercept is the point where the line crosses the x-axis, which means the y-value (∣W∣) is zero. Setting ∣W∣=0 in our equation:
Dividing both sides by nRT (which is non-zero), we get:
This is a profound result! The x-intercept is simply lnVi. Notice that temperature (T) has completely vanished from this expression.
The Final Verdict
Because both the T1 and T2 processes are expansions of the same gas starting from the same closed system setup, they must share the exact same initial volume, Vi.
Consequently, both lines must intersect the x-axis at the exact same point: lnVi.
If we look at the given options:
Graph (a) shows the lines starting from the same point on the y-axis, which implies they have the same y-intercept. But c=−nRTlnVi, so different temperatures mean different y-intercepts. This is incorrect.
Graph (b) and Graph (d) show the lines having y-intercepts with different signs or one being zero. Since Vi is constant, the term lnVi has a fixed sign. Therefore, both y-intercepts must share the same sign. These are incorrect.
Graph (c)* shows both lines originating from the exact same point on the positive x-axis and diverging with T2 being steeper. This perfectly aligns with our mathematical deduction that they share a common x-intercept.
Thus, Graph (c) is the undisputed correct depiction of the process.