The Setup
A Stretchy Pendulum
Imagine a simple pendulum swinging back and forth. We usually assume the string or wire holding the bob is perfectly rigid and inextensible. But in reality, materials have elasticity!
In this problem, we have a pendulum with a uniform wire of cross-sectional area A. Initially, it has a time period T. We know the formula for the time period of a simple pendulum is:
Now, we add an extra mass M to the bob. Because the wire is elastic, this extra weight pulls down on the wire, causing it to stretch by a small amount, let's call it ΔL. The new, longer length of the pendulum is L+ΔL. This increase in length naturally leads to a new, longer time period, TM:
Enter Young's Modulus
To figure out exactly how much the wire stretches, we need to use a property of the material called Young's Modulus (Y). Young's Modulus is a measure of stiffness and is defined as the ratio of longitudinal stress to longitudinal strain.
The additional stress on the wire is caused by the added weight Mg acting over the cross-sectional area A:
The strain is the fractional change in length:
Substituting these into the Young's Modulus equation gives us:
Rearranging this to solve for the extension ΔL, we get:
The New Time Period
Now that we have an expression for the extension, let's plug it back into our equation for the new time period TM:
This looks a bit messy. To clean it up and relate it back to our original time period T, let's square both time period equations and divide the new one by the old one. This is a classic physics trick to eliminate constants like 2π and g!
(TTM)2=gLgL+ΔL=LL+ΔL
Simplifying the right side, we get:
Bringing It All Together
Now, let's substitute our expression for ΔL back into this ratio:
Notice how beautifully the original length L cancels out!
We are almost there. The question asks us to find an expression for Y1. Let's isolate the term containing Y by subtracting 1 from both sides:
Finally, multiply both sides by MgA to leave Y1 by itself:
And there we have it! By combining the kinematics of simple harmonic motion with the mechanics of solid materials, we've derived the exact relationship. This matches option (a).