The problem presents a fascinating interplay between two fundamental modes of heat transfer: conduction and radiation. We have a rod acting as a thermal bridge between a hot furnace at temperature T1 and the cooler surroundings at temperature Ts.
The key to unlocking this problem lies in understanding the steady-state condition and applying a clever mathematical approximation.
Analyzing the Setup
In a steady state, the temperature profile of the rod does not change with time. This means that the rate at which heat enters the rod from the furnace must equal the rate at which heat travels through the rod, which in turn must equal the rate at which heat is lost from the other end.
The problem explicitly states that heat is lost only by radiation at the exposed end (temperature T2). Therefore, we can equate the rate of heat conduction through the rod to the rate of heat radiation from its end.
The rate of heat conduction is given by Fourier's Law:
Hcond=LKA(T1−T2)
The rate of heat radiation is given by the Stefan-Boltzmann Law:
Hrad=eAσ(T24−Ts4)
Equating the two, we get our master equation:
LKA(T1−T2)=eAσ(T24−Ts4)
Notice how the cross-sectional area
A beautifully cancels out, leaving us with:
LK(T1−T2)=eσ(T24−Ts4)
The Binomial Magic
We are given that
T2=Ts+ΔT, where
ΔT≪Ts. This small temperature difference is our cue to use an approximation. Let's substitute
T2 into the radiation term:
T24=(Ts+ΔT)4
To make this manageable, we factor out
Ts:
T24=Ts4(1+TsΔT)4
Since
TsΔT≪1, we can apply the binomial approximation
(1+x)n≈1+nx:
T24≈Ts4(1+4TsΔT)=Ts4+4Ts3ΔT
This simplifies the radiation term immensely:
T24−Ts4≈4Ts3ΔT
Final Calculation
Now, let's substitute this back into our master equation, and also replace
T2 with
Ts+ΔT on the conduction side:
LK(T1−(Ts+ΔT))=eσ(4Ts3ΔT)
Expanding the left side:
LK(T1−Ts)−LKΔT=4eσTs3ΔT
Our goal is to isolate
ΔT. Let's move all terms containing
ΔT to one side:
LK(T1−Ts)=4eσTs3ΔT+LKΔT
Factoring out
ΔT:
LK(T1−Ts)=(4eσTs3+LK)ΔT
Taking the common denominator on the right side:
LK(T1−Ts)=(L4eσLTs3+K)ΔT
Finally, solving for
ΔT:
ΔT=(4eσLTs3+KK)(T1−Ts)
The problem states that
ΔT∝(T1−Ts). By comparing our result with this relation, we can clearly see that the proportionality constant is:
4eσLTs3+KK
This result is profound. It shows how a highly non-linear process like radiation can be linearized for small temperature differences, effectively defining a "radiative thermal resistance" that acts in series with the conductive thermal resistance of the rod.