The Mystery of the Disappearing Molecules
Imagine you are a chemist looking at a beaker filled with 30 g of benzene. You carefully weigh out an unknown amount, let's call it w g, of benzoic acid (C6H5COOH) and dissolve it. You expect a certain depression in the freezing point based on the number of molecules you added. But nature has a trick up its sleeve!
In non-polar solvents like benzene, carboxylic acids like benzoic acid don't like to stay alone. Thanks to intermolecular hydrogen bonding, they pair up to form dimers.
2C6H5COOH⇌(C6H5COOH)2
This means the actual number of particles floating in the solution is less than what you initially put in. Since colligative properties like freezing point depression depend strictly on the number of particles, the observed depression will be less than the theoretical one.
Unmasking the van't Hoff Factor
To account for this molecular pairing, we use the van't Hoff factor (i). It is the ratio of the actual number of particles in solution to the number of particles initially dissolved.
Let's set up the equilibrium. If we start with 1 mole of benzoic acid and its degree of association is α:
- Moles of unassociated benzoic acid remaining =1−α
- Moles of dimer formed =2α
The problem states that the percentage association is 80%, which means α=0.8.
Let's calculate the total moles at equilibrium:
Total moles=(1−0.8)+20.8
Total moles=0.2+0.4=0.6
Therefore, our van't Hoff factor is:
i=10.6=0.6
An i value less than 1 perfectly confirms that our particles are associating!
The Freezing Point Equation
Now, we bring in the master equation for the depression in freezing point:
We know that molality (m) is the moles of solute per kilogram of solvent. Expanding the molality term, we get:
ΔTf=i×Kf×Mwsolute×wsolventwsolute×1000
We are given all the necessary parameters:
- ΔTf=2 K
- Kf=5 K kg mol−1
- Mwsolute=122 g mol−1
- wsolvent=30 g
The Final Calculation
Let's substitute our known values into the expanded equation:
Now, it's just a matter of careful algebra. Let's simplify the numerator and the denominator:
2=36603×w×1000
2=36603000w
Rearranging to solve for our unknown mass w:
w=30002×3660
w=30007320=2.44 g
Looking at our options, 2.4 g is the closest match. The beauty of this problem lies in realizing that without the van't Hoff factor, our calculated mass would have been completely wrong. Always respect the solvent-solute dynamics!