At x=1, substitute the known values: g(1)=32π and g′(1)=−π.
Recall that the inner angle 3πcos(g(1))=−6π.
y′(1)=3sin2(−6π)⋅cos(−6π)⋅3π(−sin(32π))⋅(−π)
Computing y′(1)
Substitute the standard trigonometric values:
sin(−6π)=−21, cos(−6π)=23, and sin(32π)=23.
y′(1)=3⋅(−21)2⋅23⋅3π⋅(−23)⋅(−π)
y′(1)=3⋅41⋅23⋅3π⋅23⋅π=163π2
Final Verification of Options
We have found our two key values at x=1:
y(1)=−81 and y′(1)=163π2.
Let's test the expression from the options: 2y′+3π2y.
2(163π2)+3π2(−81)=83π2−83π2=0.
Thus, the relation 2y′+3π2y=0 is correct.
00:00 / 00:00
The Sigma Insight: Techniques of Differentiation
Analyzing the Setup
The Art of Decomposition: Taming the Monster. Welcome, fellow traveler on the path to JEE mastery. Today, we face a function that, at first glance, seems designed to induce panic.
It is a nested, multi-layered beast:
y=sin3(3πcos(32π(−4x3+5x2+1)3/2))
But here is the secret: complexity is often just a mask for simplicity. The first step in our journey is to strip away that mask. We define the innermost algebraic core as:
g(x)=32π(−4x3+5x2+1)3/2
By doing this, we transform our terrifying function into a much friendlier form:
y=sin3(3πcos(g(x)))
We have effectively turned a mountain into a series of small, manageable hills.
The Inner Sanctum
Evaluating at x=1
Now, we need to see what happens at the specific point x=1. We start by evaluating our inner function g(1). Substituting x=1 into our expression, we get:
g(1)=32π(−4(1)3+5(1)2+1)3/2
The polynomial inside the bracket simplifies beautifully: −4+5+1=2. So, we have:
g(1)=32π(2)3/2
Since 23/2=22, the expression becomes:
g(1)=32π⋅22=32π
With this, we can find y(1)=sin3(3πcos(2π/3)). Since cos(2π/3)=−1/2, we have:
y(1)=sin3(−π/6)=(−1/2)3=−1/8
We have successfully conquered the first peak.
The Chain Rule Symphony
Now, we must differentiate. This is where the Chain Rule becomes our best friend. We need y′(x).
Differentiating y=sin3(…) requires us to peel the layers: first the cube, then the sine, then the cosine, and finally the inner function g(x). The derivative is:
Before we plug in x=1, we need g′(1). Differentiating g(x)=32π(−4x3+5x2+1)3/2 gives:
g′(x)=32π⋅23(−4x3+5x2+1)1/2⋅(−12x2+10x)
At x=1, this simplifies to:
g′(1)=22π⋅2⋅(−2)=−π
The Elegant Convergence
Finally, we bring it all together. Substituting g(1)=2π/3 and g′(1)=−π into our derivative expression, we calculate:
y′(1)=3sin2(−π/6)⋅cos(−π/6)⋅3π(−sin(2π/3))⋅(−π)
Using the standard values sin(−π/6)=−1/2, cos(−π/6)=3/2, and sin(2π/3)=3/2, we get:
y′(1)=3(41)(23)(3π)(−23)(−π)=163π2
Now, we check the relation:
2y′(1)+3π2y(1)=2(163π2)+3π2(−81)=83π2−83π2=0
The beauty of the cancellation is the reward for your persistence. You have solved the problem not by brute force, but by elegant, systematic decomposition. The final result is 0.