Here, the upper limit is h(x)=x and the lower limit is g(x)=1.
Finding f′(x)
Substitute h(x)=x and g(x)=1 into the Leibniz formula:
f′(x)=2−x2⋅dxd(x)−2−12⋅dxd(1)
Since dxd(x)=1 and dxd(1)=0:
f′(x)=2−x2⋅1−0=2−x2
Setting up x2−f′(x)=0
We are given the equation: x2−f′(x)=0
Substitute f′(x)=2−x2 into the equation:
x2−2−x2=0
Isolate the radical term on one side:
x2=2−x2
Domain and Range Constraints
Equation: x2=2−x2
Constraint 1 (LHS): Since x2≥0, the right-hand side must also be non-negative.
Constraint 2 (RHS): For the square root to be defined, we must have 2−x2≥0⇒x2≤2.
Combining these, any valid real solution must satisfy 0≤x2≤2.
Squaring Both Sides
Square both sides of x2=2−x2:
(x2)2=(2−x2)2
x4=2−x2
Rearrange all terms to one side to form a polynomial equation:
x4+x2−2=0
Factorizing the Equation
Let u=x2. The equation becomes a quadratic in u:
u2+u−2=0
Factorize by splitting the middle term:
u2+2u−u−2=0⇒u(u+2)−1(u+2)=0
(u+2)(u−1)=0
Substitute back u=x2:
(x2+2)(x2−1)=0
Solving for x
From (x2+2)(x2−1)=0, we have two cases:
Case 1: x2+2=0⇒x2=−2
Since x must be real, x2 cannot be negative. We reject this case.
Case 2: x2−1=0⇒x2=1
This gives: x=1 or x=−1
Domain Check and Graphical View
Verify the roots against the domain constraint x2≤2:
For x=±1, we have x2=1, which satisfies 1≤2.
Thus, both x=1 and x=−1 are valid real roots.
Graphically, these are the x-coordinates of the intersection points of the semicircle y=2−x2 and the parabola y=x2.
The correct option is (a) ±1.
00:00 / 00:00
The Sigma Insight: Newton-Leibniz & Reduction Formulas
Solution Diagram
Analyzing the Setup
My dear student, welcome to a journey through one of the most elegant intersections of calculus and algebra. Today, we are dissecting the function f(x)=∫1x2−t2dt.
At first glance, this might look like a daunting integral, but I want you to shift your perspective. This is an accumulation function; it is a dynamic process where the area under the curve 2−t2 is being 'accumulated' as x moves.
Before we touch any algebra, let us respect the domain. For the integrand 2−t2 to exist in the real number system, we must have 2−t2≥0, which means t∈[−2,2]. Keep this boundary in your mind; it is the fence within which our solution must live.
The Magic of the Newton-Leibniz Rule
Now, we are tasked with finding the real roots of x2−f′(x)=0. Many students would immediately try to solve the integral, but that is a trap! We only need f′(x).
This is where the Newton-Leibniz Rule becomes our best friend. It tells us that the derivative of an integral with a variable upper limit x is simply the integrand evaluated at x. Mathematically:
dxd∫1x2−t2dt=2−x2⋅dxd(x)−2−12⋅dxd(1)
Since the derivative of x is 1 and the derivative of the constant 1 is 0, the entire expression collapses into the beautiful, simple result:
f′(x)=2−x2
See how the complexity vanished? That is the power of knowing your theorems.
The Algebraic Battle
With f′(x) in our toolkit, the equation x2−f′(x)=0 transforms into x2=2−x2. Now, we are in the realm of algebra.
To solve this, we must isolate the radical. Squaring both sides is the logical next step, but we must be vigilant. Squaring is a 'dangerous' operation because it can create extraneous roots.
When we square both sides, we get (x2)2=(2−x2)2, which simplifies to x4=2−x2. Rearranging this, we arrive at the biquadratic equation:
x4+x2−2=0
This is a quadratic in disguise! By substituting u=x2, we get u2+u−2=0. Factoring this, we find (u+2)(u−1)=0. This gives us two potential paths: x2=−2 or x2=1.
The Final Verification
We must now apply our filters. We already established that x must be real, so x2=−2 is impossible. We are left with x2=1, which gives us x=±1.
Finally, we check our domain constraint: x2≤2. Since 1≤2, both roots are valid.
Graphically, you are looking for the intersection of the parabola y=x2 and the semicircle y=2−x2. They meet perfectly at x=1 and x=−1.
You have successfully navigated the trap, applied the theorem, and verified the result. This is the essence of JEE Advanced mathematics—not just calculation, but conceptual mastery.