Analyzing the Setup
Welcome, fellow traveler on the path to JEE excellence. Today, we are going to dismantle a problem that, at first glance, looks like a tangled mess of fractional exponents.
We are looking at the integral:
When you see expressions like this, it is natural to feel a moment of hesitation. The fractional powers x32 and x21 are not just numbers; they are barriers to the standard power rule of integration. But in the world of calculus, every barrier is just an invitation to perform a clever transformation.
The Strategy of Substitution
How do we clear these denominators? We need a substitution that turns these fractional powers into clean, beautiful integers.
We look at the denominators of our exponents: 3 and 2. To make both exponents integers, we need a power of x that is a multiple of both 3 and 2. The least common multiple (LCM) of 3 and 2 is 6.
This leads us to the brilliant substitution: x=u6. By choosing u6, we ensure that:
Suddenly, the complexity vanishes, and we are left with a simple polynomial denominator: u4+2u3.
The Differential Dance
We cannot simply change x to u without accounting for the differential dx. If x=u6, then the derivative of x with respect to u is:
Now, let us assemble our new integral. Substituting our terms, we get:
Look at the denominator again. We can factor out u3 to get u3(u+2). This allows us to cancel u3 from the numerator and denominator, simplifying our integral to:
This is the moment where the problem shifts from 'impossible' to 'manageable.'
Algebraic Elegance
We are now facing the integral of an improper rational function: u+2u2. Because the degree of the numerator (2) is greater than the degree of the denominator (1), we must simplify.
We know that u2−4 factors into (u−2)(u+2). So, let us rewrite u2 as (u2−4)+4. This gives us:
u+2(u−2)(u+2)+4=(u−2)+u+24
Now, the integration becomes a simple task of term-by-term calculus. We integrate u, −2, and u+24 separately:
Distributing the 6, we arrive at:
The Final Reveal
We are almost at the finish line. We must return to our original variable x. Since x=u6, we have u=x61. Substituting this back, our function becomes:
f(x)=3x31−12x61+24ln(x61+2)+C
The problem provides us with a boundary condition: f(0)=−26+24ln(2). By plugging in x=0, the terms involving x vanish, leaving us with:
The logarithmic terms cancel out perfectly, revealing that C=−26. Finally, we evaluate f(1):
f(1)=3(1)31−12(1)61+24ln(161+2)−26
This simplifies to 3−12+24ln(3)−26, which is −35+24ln(3). Comparing this to a+bln(3), we find a=−35 and b=24.
The final result is:
a+b=−35+24=−11