Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are standing before a complex, multi-layered puzzle. You have a quadratic polynomial, f(x)=x2+bx+p, and you are told that it shares a root with its own four-fold composition, f(f(f(f(x))))=0.
We define our polynomial as f(x)=x2+bx+p. We know f(0)=p, which is our constant term. We are also given f(1)=1/3.
Substituting x=1, we get 1+b+p=1/3, which simplifies to the following anchor equation:
The Collapse of Complexity
Consider the common root α. By definition, f(α)=0. When we look at the nested equation f(f(f(f(α))))=0, we can substitute from the inside out.
Since f(α)=0, the expression becomes f(f(f(0)))=0. Because f(0)=p, this simplifies further to f(f(p))=0.
The entire sixteen-degree complexity has vanished. We are left with the simple statement that f(p) must be a root of f(x)=0.
The Algebraic Bridge
If f(p) is a root, then f(f(p))=0. Let us calculate f(p) explicitly:
Using our earlier anchor, b+p=−2/3, we substitute this into our expression for f(p):
Since f(p)=p/3 is a root of f(x)=0, it must satisfy the equation f(p/3)=0. Substituting p/3 into our quadratic form:
Dividing by p (assuming $p
eq 0$), we get 9p+3b+1=0. This simplifies to the linear constraint:
The Final Resolution
We now have a system of two linear equations:
1) b+p=−32
2) 3b+p=−9
Subtracting the first from the second, we find 2b=−9+2/3=−25/3, which yields b=−25/6. Substituting this back into our first equation, we find p=7/2.
Our polynomial is now fully revealed: f(x)=x2−625x+27. To find f(−3), we substitute:
f(−3)=(−3)2−625(−3)+27=9+225+27=9+232=9+16
The final result is: