Analyzing the Setup
We are given two functions: f(x)=5−∣x−2∣ and g(x)=∣x+1∣.
Think of f(x) as a mountain. The absolute value function ∣x−2∣ is always non-negative—it is a V-shape sitting on the x-axis with its vertex at x=2.
When we write f(x)=5−∣x−2∣, we are taking that V-shape, flipping it upside down, and shifting it up by 5 units. The highest point, the peak, occurs when we subtract the smallest possible value from 5. Since the smallest value of ∣x−2∣ is 0 (at x=2), the maximum value of f(x) is 5, and it occurs at α=2.
Now, look at g(x)=∣x+1∣. This is the classic, standard V-shape. Its lowest point, the trough, is where the expression inside the absolute value vanishes. Setting x+1=0, we find the minimum at β=−1.
We have our coordinates: α=2 and β=−1.
The Gatekeeper of Calculus
The problem asks us to evaluate the limit as x→αβ. If we multiply our values, we get αβ=−2.
However, as we discussed in our FAQs, sometimes the path is not a straight line. If we test x=2 (our α), something magical happens. Let us substitute x=2 into our expression:
L=x→2limx2−6x+8(x−1)(x2−5x+6)
In the numerator, we have (2−1)(4−10+6)=1⋅0=0. In the denominator, we have 4−12+8=0.
We have arrived at the 00 indeterminate form. This is the 'gatekeeper.' It tells us that there is a hidden factor of (x−2) lurking in both the numerator and the denominator, preventing us from seeing the true value of the limit.
Algebraic Surgery
Do not be intimidated by the numerator. We already have (x−1) factored out. Let us focus on the quadratic part: x2−5x+6.
We need two numbers that multiply to 6 and add to −5. Those numbers are −2 and −3. Thus, the numerator becomes (x−1)(x−2)(x−3).
Now, let us turn our attention to the denominator: x2−6x+8. We need two numbers that multiply to 8 and add to −6. Those are −2 and −4. The denominator becomes (x−2)(x−4).
Our expression now looks like this:
L=x→2lim(x−2)(x−4)(x−1)(x−2)(x−3)
Final Calculation
This is the moment of clarity. Because we are taking the limit as x approaches 2, we know that x is not exactly 2. Therefore, (x−2) is not zero.
We can safely cancel the (x−2) terms from the numerator and the denominator. This is the 'surgery' we talked about—we have removed the singularity that was causing the 00 error.
We are left with a much simpler expression:
Now, we can simply substitute x=2 without fear:
And there it is. The final answer is 21. By visualizing the functions, identifying the indeterminate form, and performing careful algebraic factorization, we turned a daunting limit into a simple arithmetic problem.