The Geometric Dance of Inverse Functions
Imagine you are standing before a vast, shimmering mirror. In mathematics, the line y=x is that mirror. When we talk about inverse functions, we are talking about a reflection across this very line.
In this problem, we are given f(x)=x3+3x+2 and the relation g(f(x))=x. This is the classic, textbook definition of an inverse function, where g=f−1.
Geometrically, if you were to plot the curve of f(x) in blue, its reflection across the line y=x would give you the curve of g(x) in green. They are perfectly symmetric, a beautiful dance of coordinates where every point (x,y) on f becomes (y,x) on g.
The Inverse Derivative Rule
A Shortcut to Mastery
Now, we are asked to find g′(2). A common trap is to try and find the explicit formula for g(x), but solving the cubic f(x)=x3+3x+2 for x is a nightmare.
Instead, we use the inverse derivative rule:
where y=f(x). This rule tells us that the slope of the inverse function at y is simply the reciprocal of the slope of the original function at x.
First, we find the x that maps to y=2. Setting x3+3x+2=2, we get x3+3x=0, which simplifies to x(x2+3)=0. The only real solution is x=0.
Now, we find the derivative of f(x):
At x=0, f′(0)=3. Therefore, g′(2)=f′(0)1=31. Since $\frac{1}{3}
eq \frac{1}{15}$, we can confidently say that Option 1 is false.
Decoding the Mystery of h(x)
Next, we encounter the function h(x) defined by h(g(g(x)))=x. This looks intimidating, but we can break it down. We know that f and g are inverses, meaning they undo each other.
If we apply the function f to both sides of the equation h(g(g(x)))=x, the outermost g is cancelled out, leaving us with h(g(x))=f(x). If we apply f once more, the remaining g is cancelled, and we arrive at the simplified relation:
Now, checking Option 3, we calculate h(0)=f(f(0)). First, f(0)=03+3(0)+2=2. Then, f(2)=23+3(2)+2=16. Thus, h(0)=16, and Option 3 is true.
The Chain Rule
The Engine of Calculus
Finally, we tackle Option 2: h′(1). We have h(x)=f(f(x)). To differentiate this, we use the chain rule:
This is the engine of calculus, allowing us to differentiate composite functions with ease. Substituting x=1, we get h′(1)=f′(f(1))⋅f′(1).
First, f(1)=13+3(1)+2=6. Next, f′(1)=3(1)2+3=6. Finally, f′(f(1))=f′(6)=3(6)2+3=111.
Multiplying these together:
Option 2 is true! We have navigated the geometry of inverses, mastered the inverse derivative rule, and wielded the chain rule to uncover the secrets of composite functions. You have successfully decoded the problem.