Analyzing the Setup
In the context of composite functions, we define the system as f(g(x)). For this system to function, the input x must be valid for the inner function g(x), and the resulting output g(x) must be a valid input for the outer function f(x).
If either condition is violated, the system fails. We must identify all values of x that satisfy these constraints to determine the valid domain.
The Two Security Checkpoints
Checkpoint 1: The input
x must be valid for the inner function
g(x)=2x+5∣x∣+1. Since division by zero is undefined, we require the denominator to be non-zero:
2x+5eq0⟹xeq−25
Checkpoint 2: The output g(x) must be a valid input for f(x)=2x+12x+3. The function f(x) is undefined when its denominator is zero, specifically when x=−21.
Therefore, we must ensure that $g(x)
eq -\frac{1}{2}$ for all x in the domain of g. If g(x) ever equals −21, the composite function f(g(x)) will crash.
The Algebraic Investigation
To find if any values of
x cause a system failure at the second checkpoint, we solve the equation:
2x+5∣x∣+1=−21
Cross-multiplying to clear the fractions, we obtain:
2(∣x∣+1)=−(2x+5)
2∣x∣+2=−2x−5
Because of the absolute value term ∣x∣, we must analyze this equation across two distinct intervals.
Case Analysis
Case 1: x≥0
In this interval,
∣x∣=x. The equation simplifies to:
2x+2=−2x−5
4x=−7⟹x=−47
Since our assumption was x≥0, the value x=−47 is a contradiction. We must reject this solution.
Case 2: x<0
In this interval,
∣x∣=−x. The equation becomes:
−2x+2=−2x−5
Adding 2x to both sides results in 2=−5. This is a mathematical impossibility, indicating that no value of x in this interval satisfies the equation.
The Triumph of Logic
Our investigation confirms that g(x) never outputs −21. Consequently, the second security checkpoint never blocks any input.
The only restriction on the domain remains the one identified at the first checkpoint. The domain of the composite function f(g(x)) is all real numbers except for x=−25.
Final Domain: R∖{−25}