The Geometry of the Cubic Battlefield
Imagine you are standing on the unit square S=[0,1]×[0,1]. It is a simple, elegant space.
Inside this square, a cubic curve f(x)=3x3−x2+95x+3617 carves a path, dividing our square into two distinct territories: the Green region (G) above the curve and the Red region (R) below it.
At first glance, this looks like a problem that demands brute-force calculus. But as we will see, it is actually a symphony of geometric relationships waiting to be uncovered.
Phase 1
The Foundation of Area
Before we introduce the horizontal line Lh, we must understand the total area of these regions. The Red region is the area under the curve, which we find using the definite integral:
AR=∫01(3x3−x2+95x+3617)dx
Applying the power rule of integration, ∫xndx=n+1xn+1, we get:
AR=[12x4−3x3+185x2+3617x]01
Evaluating this at the limits, we find:
Finding a common denominator of 36, this simplifies to:
Since the total area of the unit square is 1, the Green region AG must also be 1−21=21. Both regions are perfectly balanced!
Phase 2
The Slicing Line Lh
Now, we introduce the horizontal line Lh at height y=h. This line slices our square into two rectangles: a top rectangle of height 1−h and a bottom rectangle of height h.
This line also partitions our Green and Red regions into four parts: Gabove, Gbelow, Rabove, and Rbelow. We know two fundamental truths:
Gabove+Gbelow=21andRabove+Rbelow=21
Furthermore, the area of the top rectangle is Gabove+Rabove=1−h, and the area of the bottom rectangle is Gbelow+Rbelow=h. These are our master keys.
Phase 3
The Algebraic Magic
Let us test the options. Option A claims Gabove=Gbelow. Since their sum is 1/2, this would require Gabove=1/4.
However, as h increases from 1/4 to 2/3, the area Gabove decreases from 1/2 to 1/3. It never hits 1/4, so Option A is incorrect.
Now, look at Option C: Gabove=Rbelow. Instead of solving for these areas, let us look at their difference. From our relations:
Gabove=1−h−RaboveandRbelow=21−Rabove
Subtracting these, we get:
Gabove−Rbelow=(1−h−Rabove)−(21−Rabove)=21−h
For this to be zero, h must be 1/2. Since 1/2 is in our interval, Option C is correct!
By using this exact same logic for Option D, we find that:
Rabove−Gbelow=(21−Rbelow)−(h−Rbelow)=21−h
This also equals zero at h=1/2. Finally, Option B works because at h=1/4, the line is below the curve, making Gbelow=0, which forces Rbelow=h=1/4, satisfying the condition Rabove=Rbelow=1/4.
The beauty of this problem lies not in the integration, but in the elegant cancellation of terms.