Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are standing at the edge of a complex mathematical landscape. You are given a derivative,
and asked to evaluate a seemingly daunting integral:
At first glance, this might look like a nightmare of transcendental functions, but let us take a breath. The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus is our master key here. It tells us that if F′(x)=f(x), then the integral of f(x) is simply F(x).
The Art of Strategic Substitution
Look closely at the target integral:
The argument of the sine function is x2, while the denominator is just x. This is a classic signal in calculus. We need the argument of the sine function to be a single variable to match our given derivative.
This screams for a substitution. We want to set t=x2. But wait, if t=x2, then dt=2xdx. We do not have a 2x in the numerator.
How do we fix this? We use a clever algebraic maneuver: multiply the integrand by xx. This transforms our integral into:
Now, the 2x is waiting for us in the numerator, and the denominator has become x2, which is just t.
The Transformation
Now, let us execute the substitution. With t=x2, our differential 2xdx becomes dt. The denominator x2 becomes t.
And most importantly, we must transform the limits of integration. When x=1, t=12=1. When x=4, t=42=16.
Our integral now becomes:
Look at this result. It is a perfect match for our given derivative relation dtdF(t)=tesint. By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, this integral is simply F(16)−F(1).
The Final Comparison
The problem tells us that our integral is equal to F(k)−F(1). We have just calculated that the integral is F(16)−F(1).
By comparing these two expressions, the conclusion is immediate and elegant:
k=16
You see, the complexity of the function F(x) was just a distraction. By understanding the structure of the integral and applying the right substitution, we peeled back the layers to reveal a simple, beautiful answer. Never be intimidated by the notation; look for the underlying symmetry, and the path will always reveal itself.