Analyzing the Setup
The standard approach to an Arithmetic Progression (A.P.) is to define terms as a,a+d,a+2d,a+3d. However, for an even number of terms, we can utilize symmetry to save time.
By choosing our terms as a−3d,a−d,a+d,a+3d, we engineer a cancellation. When we sum these terms, the d terms vanish, leaving us with:
This immediately yields a=12. This choice of variables acts as a strategic coordinate system for the problem.
The Algebraic Heavy Lifting
We face the product condition: (a1a2a3a4)+l4=361. With a=12 and l=2d (implying d=l/2), our terms become:
(12−23l),(12−2l),(12+2l),(12+23l)
To avoid drowning in algebra, we group the terms by pairing the first with the fourth and the second with the third. Applying the difference of squares identity, (x−y)(x+y)=x2−y2, the product transforms into:
(144−49l2)(144−4l2)+l4=361
Taming the Quadratic Beast
To simplify, we introduce the substitution k=l2. The equation becomes:
(144−49k)(144−4k)+k2=361
Expanding this expression with precision, we arrive at:
Rearranging this into a standard quadratic form, we obtain:
Solving for k, we find two potential values: k=100 or k=130.4.
The Final Victory
The constraint of the problem acts as our filter. Since l must be an integer, k (which is l2) must be a perfect square.
Because 130.4 is not a perfect square, we discard it. Thus, l2=100, which gives us l=±10.
With l=10, we find d=5. Substituting these back into our symmetric terms, we get the sequence:
The largest term is 27. You have successfully navigated the trap of brute-force calculation by observing the underlying structure of the problem.