Analyzing the Setup
Welcome, fellow traveler, to the beautiful world of combinatorics. Today, we are not just solving a problem; we are embarking on a journey to organize chaos.
We have a set of numbers, A, defined as all integers n in the range [100,700] that are neither multiples of 3 nor 4. It sounds simple, but counting what is 'not' there is often the most elegant way to see what is.
Defining the Universe
Imagine a vast, orderly library containing every integer from 100 to 700. This is our Universal Set, U.
To find the size of this set, we must be precise. A common pitfall is to simply calculate 700−100, which gives 600. But remember, we are including both 100 and 700.
Think of it like a fence: if you have a fence 100 meters long with posts every meter, you have 101 posts, not 100. Thus, our total count is:
We have 601 numbers in our library.
The Strategy of Shadows
We want to find the numbers that are neither multiples of 3 nor 4. Trying to pick these out one by one would be a nightmare.
Instead, let's use the power of complementary counting. We will find the 'bad' numbers—those that are multiples of 3 or 4—and subtract them from our total.
Mathematically, we are looking for N(M3c∩M4c), which is equivalent to:
We are essentially finding the area of the rectangle outside our two overlapping circles in a Venn diagram.
The Arithmetic Progression
Now, let's hunt for the multiples. First, the multiples of 3 (M3). The first multiple of 3 in our range is 102, and the last is 699.
This is a perfect Arithmetic Progression (A.P.) where the first term a=102 and the common difference d=3. Using the formula for the n-th term, an=a+(n−1)d, we set:
Solving this, we find 597=3(n−1), which simplifies to 199=n−1, giving us n=200. There are 200 multiples of 3.
Next, the multiples of 4 (M4). The first is 100, and the last is 700. Here, a=100 and d=4. Setting:
We get 600=4(n−1), so 150=n−1, meaning n=151. There are 151 multiples of 4.
The Inclusion-Exclusion Principle
Here is where the magic happens. If we simply add 200 and 151, we have overcounted. Numbers like 12, 24, and 36 are multiples of both 3 and 4.
They are hiding in both groups! We must identify these common multiples, which are multiples of LCM(3,4)=12. The first multiple of 12 in our range is 108, and the last is 696.
Using our A.P. formula again:
This yields 588=12(n−1), so 49=n−1, giving n=50. We have 50 common multiples.
Now, we apply the Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion:
N(M3∪M4)=N(M3)+N(M4)−N(M3∩M4)=200+151−50=301
The Grand Finale
We have identified 301 numbers that are multiples of 3 or 4. To find the numbers that are neither, we simply subtract this from our universal set:
N(A)=N(U)−N(M3∪M4)=601−301=300
And there it is! 300 numbers, standing tall, neither divisible by 3 nor 4. You have successfully navigated the logic of sets. Keep this clarity, and no counting problem will ever intimidate you again.