Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are standing on the edge of a mathematical landscape, looking at a function F(x) defined by two nested integrals. We are given f:[0,5]→R as a continuous function, with f(1)=3.
Our goal is to understand the behavior of the function defined as:
F(x)=∫1xt2g(t)dt
where
g(t) is defined by the inner integral:
g(t)=∫1tf(u)du
The Inner Sanctum
First, let us focus on the inner function g(t)=∫1tf(u)du. This function acts as an accumulator, gathering the area under f(u) from 1 to t.
When we evaluate
g(1), we substitute
t=1:
g(1)=∫11f(u)du=0
Since the upper and lower limits are identical, the area is zero. This is our first crucial piece of the puzzle:
g(1)=0.
Next, we determine the derivative of
g(t) using the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus (Newton-Leibniz Rule):
g′(t)=dtd∫1tf(u)du=f(t)
Given that
f(1)=3, it follows that
g′(1)=3.
The Leibniz Magic
Now, let us turn our attention to the main function F(x)=∫1xt2g(t)dt. To find its critical points, we calculate its first derivative.
Applying the Leibniz Rule, we differentiate with respect to
x:
F′(x)=x2g(x)
Now, let us check the slope at
x=1:
F′(1)=(1)2⋅g(1)
Since we already discovered that
g(1)=0, the entire expression becomes
F′(1)=0. This confirms that
x=1 is indeed a critical point.
The Verdict
To determine if this point is a maximum or a minimum, we calculate the second derivative,
F′′(x). We apply the product rule to
F′(x)=x2g(x):
F′′(x)=2x⋅g(x)+x2⋅g′(x)
Now, let us evaluate this at
x=1:
F′′(1)=2(1)⋅g(1)+(1)2⋅g′(1)
Substituting our known values,
g(1)=0 and
g′(1)=3:
F′′(1)=2(0)+1(3)=3
Since F′′(1)=3, which is strictly greater than zero, the function is concave upwards at x=1. In the language of calculus, a positive second derivative at a critical point signifies a local minimum.
We have successfully navigated the nested integrals and uncovered the nature of the function at x=1. The function F(x) has a local minimum at x=1.