Animated Solution for Mathematics - Matrices and Determinants: Let a−2b+c=1, If f(x)=x+ax+bx+cx+2x+3x+4x+1x+2x+3, then:
Select Answer:
Visualized Solution
AnalyzingtheDeterminant
Given function: f(x)=x+ax+bx+cx+2x+3x+4x+1x+2x+3
Given condition: a−2b+c=1
ChoosingtheRightRowOperation
Notice the linear progression in the columns.
Apply row operation: R1→R1−2R2+R3
ApplyingOperationtoColumn1
For C1 in R1:
(x+a)−2(x+b)+(x+c)
=x−2x+x+a−2b+c
=a−2b+c
ApplyingOperationtoColumn2
For C2 in R1:
(x+2)−2(x+3)+(x+4)
=x−2x+x+2−6+4
=0
ApplyingOperationtoColumn3
For C3 in R1:
(x+1)−2(x+2)+(x+3)
=x−2x+x+1−4+3
=0
TheSimplifiedDeterminant
The determinant becomes:
f(x)=a−2b+cx+bx+c0x+3x+40x+2x+3
SubstitutingtheGivenCondition
Substitute a−2b+c=1
f(x)=1x+bx+c0x+3x+40x+2x+3
ExpandingtheDeterminant
Expanding along R1:
f(x)=1⋅x+3x+4x+2x+3
Evaluatingthe2×2Determinant
Cross-multiplying the elements:
f(x)=(x+3)(x+3)−(x+2)(x+4)
f(x)=(x2+6x+9)−(x2+6x+8)
FinalSimplification
f(x)=9−8=1
Since f(x)=1 is a constant function:
f(50)=1 and f(−50)=1
00:00 / 00:00
The Sigma Insight: Properties of Determinants
Solution Diagram
Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are sitting in the examination hall, the clock is ticking, and you are presented with a 3×3 determinant. At first glance, it looks like a monster. You see x everywhere—in every single entry.
Your instinct might be to dive in, expand along the first row, and start multiplying terms. But stop. Take a breath.
In JEE Advanced, whenever you see a problem that looks like a computational nightmare, there is almost always a hidden geometric or algebraic symmetry waiting to be exploited. This problem is a classic example of that.
We are given the function:
f(x)=x+ax+bx+cx+2x+3x+4x+1x+2x+3
We are also given the constraint a−2b+c=1. If you try to expand this directly, you are essentially signing up for a long, tedious algebraic slog.
Look at the columns. Look at the constants: 2,3,4 in the second column and 1,2,3 in the third. They are in arithmetic progression. This is the 'spark' we need.
The Power of Row Operations
Why do we choose the operation R1→R1−2R2+R3? Let us break down the logic. We want to eliminate the variable x because it is the source of all our trouble.
If we look at the first column, we have (x+a), (x+b), and (x+c). If we perform the operation R1−2R2+R3, the x terms become x−2x+x, which is exactly 0.
This is the beauty of linear algebra. By choosing the coefficients 1,−2,1, we are essentially creating a 'filter' that removes the variable part of the matrix. Let us apply this to the first column:
(x+a)−2(x+b)+(x+c)=x−2x+x+a−2b+c=a−2b+c
We are given that a−2b+c=1. Just like that, the first entry of our new first row becomes 1.
The Moment of Clarity
Now, let us apply the same operation to the second and third columns. For the second column, we have:
(x+2)−2(x+3)+(x+4)=x−2x+x+2−6+4=0
And for the third column:
(x+1)−2(x+2)+(x+3)=x−2x+x+1−4+3=0
Do you see what happened? The entire first row has collapsed into [1,0,0]. This is a massive victory.
We have transformed a complex determinant into something incredibly simple. The determinant now looks like this:
f(x)=1x+bx+c0x+3x+40x+2x+3
Expanding this along the first row is trivial. We simply take the element 1 and multiply it by the determinant of the remaining 2×2 minor matrix.
The Final Revelation
We are left with:
f(x)=1⋅x+3x+4x+2x+3
Now, we evaluate this 2×2 determinant using the standard cross-multiplication rule: (ad−bc).
f(x)=(x+3)(x+3)−(x+2)(x+4)
Expanding these binomials, we get:
f(x)=(x2+6x+9)−(x2+6x+8)
Watch closely as the terms cancel out. x2 minus x2 is 0. 6x minus 6x is 0. We are left with 9−8, which is 1.
This is the elegance of the problem. We started with a matrix full of x terms, and through the power of row operations, we proved that the function f(x) is actually a constant function: f(x)=1.
It does not matter if x is 50, −50, or a billion; the output will always be 1. So, when the question asks for f(50) or f(−50), the answer is staring us in the face. It is 1.