The interaction energy of London forces between two particles is proportional to r^x, where r is the

Q: Why is the interaction energy proportional to $r^{-6}$ and not $r^{-3}$ like dipole-dipole interactions?

Stationary dipole-dipole interactions have an energy proportional to $r^{-3}$. However, London forces involve *induced* dipoles. The electric field of a dipole falls off as $r^{-3}$, and the induced dipole is proportional to this field. The interaction energy between them is proportional to the square of the field, leading to the $r^{-6}$ dependence.

Q: Do London dispersion forces exist in all molecules?

Yes! Since all atoms and molecules contain electrons, they all experience temporary fluctuations in their electron clouds, leading to London dispersion forces.

Q: Are London forces always the weakest intermolecular force?

Generally, yes, for small molecules. However, in very large molecules (like long-chain hydrocarbons), the cumulative effect of London forces can be stronger than dipole-dipole interactions or even hydrogen bonds in smaller molecules.

Q: What is the difference between London forces and van der Waals forces?

Van der Waals forces is a broad term that includes London dispersion forces, dipole-dipole forces, and dipole-induced dipole forces. London forces are a specific type of van der Waals force.

Q: How does polarizability affect London forces?

Larger atoms or molecules have more electrons that are further from the nucleus and held less tightly. These electron clouds are more easily distorted (more polarizable), leading to stronger temporary dipoles and stronger London forces.

Question

The interaction energy of London forces between two particles is proportional to $r^x$, where $r$ is the distance between the particles. The value of $x$ is

Options:

(A) $3$

(B) $-3$

(C) $-6$

(D) $6$

Sigma Percentile · Accepted Answer

### The Invisible Dance of Electrons

Imagine you are looking at two completely neutral atoms sitting side by side. At first glance, it seems like nothing is happening. But if you zoom in, you will see that their electron clouds are in a constant state of chaotic motion. Because electrons are always moving, there is a chance that at any given moment, more electrons might end up on one side of the atom than the other.

This sudden, asymmetrical distribution creates what we call a **temporary dipole**. One side of the atom becomes slightly negative, and the other becomes slightly positive. But the story does not end there. This temporary dipole acts like a magnet, pushing or pulling the electrons of the neighboring atom, creating an **induced dipole**. The resulting attraction between these two fluctuating dipoles is what we call **London dispersion forces**.

### The Power of Distance

Now, how strong is this invisible dance? The strength of this interaction energy, let's call it $E$, depends heavily on the distance $r$ between the two particles. Unlike the strong electrostatic forces between ions which fall off slowly as $\frac{1}{r}$, London dispersion forces are incredibly short-ranged.

For London dispersion forces, the interaction energy is inversely proportional to the sixth power of the distance. Mathematically, we write this as:
$$E \propto \frac{1}{r^6}$$
This means that if you just double the distance between the atoms, the attractive force drops by a factor of $2^6$, which is $64$! This is why these forces only matter when atoms or molecules are very close to each other.

### Solving the Puzzle

Let's bring this back to our specific problem. The question states that the interaction energy is proportional to $r^x$. 
$$E \propto r^x$$

From our theoretical understanding of London forces, we know that the energy is proportional to $\frac{1}{r^6}$, which can be rewritten using negative exponents as:
$$E \propto r^{-6}$$

By simply comparing the exponents of $r$ in both expressions, we can immediately see the answer. 
$$x = -6$$

### The Bigger Picture

It is a straightforward theoretical fact, but visualizing the shifting electron clouds helps us remember why these forces are so short-ranged. Before we wrap up, it is always a good idea to think about other intermolecular forces. For instance, how does the interaction energy vary for stationary dipole-dipole interactions? It is proportional to $\frac{1}{r^3}$. Remembering these specific distance dependencies is a favorite concept for competitive exams. Keep this in mind, and you will never get caught off guard!

Animated Solution for Chemistry - Chemical Bonding and Molecular Structure: The interaction energy of London forces between two particles is proportional to $r^{x}$ , where $r$ is the distance between the particles. The value of $x$ is

Select Answer:

Visualized Solution

London Dispersion Forces

Temporary Dipoles

Interaction Energy $E$

Comparing with $r^{x}$

Conclusion

Other Intermolecular Forces

The Sigma Insight: Bond Parameters and Resonance

The Invisible Dance of Electrons

The Power of Distance

Solving the Puzzle

The Bigger Picture

Similar Questions

Match the type of interaction in column A with the distance dependence of their interaction energy in column B : $Column A (I) Ion-ion (II) Dipole-dipole (III) London dispersion Column B (a) \frac{1}{r} (b) \frac{1}{r ^{2}} (c) \frac{1}{r ^{3}} (d) \frac{1}{r ^{6}}$

The potential energy curve for the $H_{2}$ molecule as a function of internuclear distance is

The intermolecular potential energy for the molecules A, B, C and D given below suggests that:

Lattice energy of an ionic compound depends upon

The correct order of dipole moments for the given species is

For which of the following molecule significant $μ \neq = 0$ ?

Arrange the following bonds according to their average bond energies in descending order $C - C l, C - B r, C - F, C - I$

The dipole moments of $CCl_{4}$ , $CHCl_{3}$ and $CH_{4}$ are in the order

Select the correct statement.

Consider the following compounds in the liquid form : $O_{2}$ , $HF$ , $H_{2} O$ , $NH_{3}$ , $H_{2} O_{2}$ , $CCl_{4}$ , $CHCl_{3}$ , $C_{6} H_{6}$ , $C_{6} H_{5} Cl$ . When a charged comb is brought near their flowing stream, how many of them show deflection as per the following figure?