The Mystery of the Logarithmic Rate Equation
Imagine you are a detective, and you've just been handed a cryptic note. The note doesn't give you the identity of the suspects directly; instead, it gives you a complex mathematical relationship between their movements. This is exactly what we face in this intriguing chemical kinetics problem. We are given a logarithmic equation relating the rate of disappearance of a mysterious reactant A to the rate of appearance of an unknown product B.
The equation looks like this:
log10[−dtd[A]]=log10[dtd[B]]+0.3010
At first glance, this might seem terrifying. Logarithms mixed with calculus? But don't get intimidated. Let's take a breath and break this down step-by-step. Our ultimate goal is to strip away the mathematical disguise and reveal the simple, underlying stoichiometry of the reaction, which will then allow us to identify the actual chemicals involved.
The Magic Number: 0.3010
In the world of competitive exams like JEE and NEET, certain numbers are like old friends; when you see them, you should immediately recognize them. Look closely at the constant term on the right side of the equation: 0.3010.
Why is this number so special? Because it is the standard, widely used approximate value for the base-10 logarithm of 2.
This is a huge hint! By recognizing this, we can substitute log102 back into our equation. This transforms a messy equation with a random decimal into a clean equation where every single term is a logarithm.
log10[−dtd[A]]=log10[dtd[B]]+log102
This is a critical strategic move. It sets the stage for us to use the powerful properties of logarithms to simplify the expression further.
Unlocking the Equation with Log Properties
Now that all our terms are logarithms with the same base (base 10), we can use the fundamental product rule of logarithms. Remember the rule?
We can apply this rule to the right side of our equation to elegantly combine the two separate logarithmic terms into a single, unified term.
log10[−dtd[A]]=log10(2×[dtd[B]])
Look at how much cleaner that is! Because we now have a single logarithm on both sides of the equals sign, and they share the exact same base, we can perform the mathematical equivalent of a magic trick: we take the antilog on both sides. This completely strips away the logarithms, leaving us with a beautifully simple, linear relationship between the rates.
The Big Reveal
Finding the Stoichiometry
We are almost there. To truly understand what this equation is telling us about the reaction, we need to rearrange it to match the standard textbook format for expressing the rate of a chemical reaction. We achieve this by simply dividing both sides by 2.
Now, let's bring in the general theory. For a generic chemical reaction where x moles of A react to form y moles of B (xA→yB), the rate of the reaction is defined as:
Rate=−x1dtd[A]=y1dtd[B]
Notice the beautiful symmetry here. The coefficients in the denominator of the rate expression correspond directly to the stoichiometric coefficients in the balanced chemical equation. By comparing our derived equation with this general formula, the truth is finally revealed:
x=2 and y=1
This means that for every two moles of reactant A that disappear, exactly one mole of product B is formed. Our mystery reaction has a simple 2:1 stoichiometry:
2A→B
Analyzing the Suspects
With the stoichiometry unmasked as 2A→B, we can now evaluate our lineup of suspects (the given options) to find the perfect match.
(a) n-butane →iso-butane: This is a simple isomerization. One molecule of n-butane rearranges to form one molecule of iso-butane. The stoichiometry is 1:1. This is not our match.
(b) 3C2H2→C6H6: This is the famous trimerization of acetylene to form benzene. Three molecules of acetylene combine to form one molecule of benzene. The stoichiometry is 3:1. Incorrect.
(c) 2C2H4→C4H8: This is the dimerization of ethylene to form butene. Exactly two molecules of ethylene combine to form one molecule of butene. The stoichiometry is 2:1. This is a perfect match!
(d) N2O4→2NO2: This is the decomposition of dinitrogen tetroxide. One molecule breaks apart to form two molecules of nitrogen dioxide. The stoichiometry is 1:2. Incorrect.
Therefore, the only reaction that fits the mathematical profile we uncovered is the dimerization of ethylene. The correct option is indeed (c).
This problem is a fantastic example of how abstract mathematical relationships in kinetics are deeply tied to the physical reality of how molecules interact and combine.