Analyzing the Setup
The problem presents a high-degree polynomial equation:
z1985+z100+1=0
While this appears daunting, the solution lies in analyzing the roots of the auxiliary cubic equation:
z3+2z2+2z+1=0
The Art of Grouping
To solve the cubic equation, we rearrange the terms to reveal a hidden structure:
(z3+1)+(2z2+2z)=0
Applying the sum of cubes identity,
a3+b3=(a+b)(a2−ab+b2), to the first group and factoring the second, we obtain:
(z+1)(z2−z+1)+2z(z+1)=0
Factoring out the common term
(z+1), we get:
(z+1)[(z2−z+1)+2z]=0
(z+1)(z2+z+1)=0
The roots of this equation are z=−1 and the complex cube roots of unity, denoted as ω and ω2, which satisfy z2+z+1=0.
The Testing Ground
We must now test these candidates against the original polynomial P(z)=z1985+z100+1.
First, testing
z=−1:
(−1)1985+(−1)100+1=−1+1+1=1
Since
$1
eq 0$,
z=−1 is
not a common root.
The Magic of Omega
Next, we evaluate the polynomial at
z=ω. Using the properties
ω3=1 and
1+ω+ω2=0, we simplify the powers:
ω1985=ω3×661+2=ω2
ω100=ω3×33+1=ω
Substituting these back into the polynomial:
ω2+ω+1=0
Thus,
ω is a common root.
Finally, for
z=ω2:
(ω2)1985+(ω2)100+1=ω3970+ω200+1
Reducing the exponents modulo 3:
ω3970=ω1=ω
ω200=ω2
The expression becomes
ω+ω2+1=0, confirming that
ω2 is also a common root.
Final Conclusion
By testing the roots of the cubic equation, we have determined that z=−1 fails, while z=ω and z=ω2 satisfy the original equation.
Therefore, there are exactly 2 common roots.