Analyzing the Setup
When you look at an expression like
(1−x)1/2(1+x)3/2−(1+21x)3
most students see a wall of complexity. They see fractional powers and division, and they panic. But you see a playground—you see the Binomial Theorem.
The problem provides a golden key: x is so small that x3 and higher powers are negligible. This is not just a constraint; it is a permission slip to simplify the universe.
The Binomial Toolkit
Why do we love the Binomial Theorem? Because it allows us to turn complex, non-linear functions into simple, manageable polynomials.
The formula is our most reliable tool:
Notice that we stop at the x2 term. Because the problem states that x3 and beyond are effectively zero, calculating terms that will eventually be discarded is a luxury you cannot afford. We are looking for the 'signal' in the noise, and the signal here lives in the x2 term.
The Numerator Dance
Let us dissect the numerator. We have two distinct parts: (1+x)3/2 and (1+21x)3.
For the first term, (1+x)3/2, our index n is 23. Plugging this into our expansion:
1+(23)x+2!(23)(23−1)x2=1+23x+83x2
Now, for the second term, (1+21x)3, we treat 2x as a single unit with n=3:
1+3(2x)+2!3(3−1)(2x)2=1+23x+43x2
The Great Cancellation
Now, we bring them together. We subtract the second expansion from the first:
(1+23x+83x2)−(1+23x+43x2)
The constant 1 vanishes, and the linear term 23x vanishes. It is a moment of pure mathematical elegance. We are left with:
The Final Polish
We have −83x2 in the numerator and (1−x)1/2 in the denominator. We bring the denominator up as (1−x)−1/2 and apply the Binomial Theorem:
(1−x)−1/2≈1+(−21)(−x)=1+21x
Now, multiply this by our numerator:
−83x2(1+21x)=−83x2−163x3
Recall our constraint: we must neglect x3. Discarding the higher-order term, we arrive at our final, beautiful answer: