The Beauty of Pattern Recognition
Welcome, future engineer! Today, we are diving into a problem that looks like a simple set theory question but is actually a beautiful dance between algebra and logic.
We have two sets, X={4n−3n−1:n∈N} and Y={9(n−1):n∈N}. At first glance, they seem like strangers. But as we peel back the layers, we find a deep, elegant connection.
Phase 1
The Detective Work
In any JEE problem, if you are stuck, start by exploring. Let's look at set Y first. It is defined as 9(n−1) for natural numbers n.
If we plug in n=1,2,3,…, we get 0,9,18,27,…. This is clearly the set of all non-negative multiples of 9.
Now, let's look at set X, defined by 4n−3n−1. Let's test some values:
- For n=1: 41−3(1)−1=0
- For n=2: 42−3(2)−1=16−6−1=9
- For n=3: 43−3(3)−1=64−9−1=54
Look at these results: 0,9,54,243,…. Every single one of these is a multiple of 9.
This is our 'Aha!' moment. Our hypothesis is that every element of X is also an element of Y, meaning X⊆Y.
Phase 2
The Binomial Bridge
To prove this rigorously, we need to show that 4n−3n−1 is always a multiple of 9. The expression 4n is the key. We can rewrite 4 as (1+3), so 4n=(1+3)n.
Now, we invoke the Binomial Theorem:
(1+x)n=(0n)+(1n)x+(2n)x2+(3n)x3+⋯+(nn)xn
Substituting x=3, we get:
(1+3)n=(0n)+(1n)(3)+(2n)(32)+(3n)(33)+…
Since (0n)=1 and (1n)=n, this simplifies to:
(1+3)n=1+3n+(2n)(9)+(3n)(27)+…
Phase 3
The Elegant Cancellation
Now, let's bring this back to our original expression for X: 4n−3n−1. Substituting our expansion, we get:
X=[1+3n+(2n)(9)+(3n)(27)+…]−3n−1
Watch the magic happen! The 1 and −1 cancel out. The 3n and −3n cancel out. We are left with:
Every term here contains at least a factor of 9. We can factor it out:
Since the term in the bracket is an integer, X is indeed a multiple of 9. This confirms that X⊆Y.
In the world of sets, if X is a subset of Y, then their union X∪Y is simply the larger set, Y. We have solved the puzzle! The final result is X∪Y=Y.