Analyzing the Setup
Welcome, future engineers! Today, we are going to dismantle a problem that often intimidates students at first glance. We are given a matrix A=(0K2−1) and a seemingly daunting equation: A(A3+3I)=2I.
Many students see A3 and A4 and immediately reach for their pens to start multiplying matrices. I want you to pause and take a deep breath. In the world of JEE Advanced, brute force is rarely the intended path.
There is a hidden elegance here, a mathematical shortcut that transforms a tedious calculation into a beautiful, logical flow. This shortcut is the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem.
The DNA of a Matrix
Every square matrix has a 'DNA'—a characteristic equation that defines its behavior. This equation is found by calculating the determinant of A−λI and setting it to zero.
For our matrix
A, we set up the determinant:
Expanding this, we get
(−λ)(−1−λ)−(2)(K)=0, which simplifies to:
λ2+λ−2K=0
Now, here is the magic: the
Cayley-Hamilton theorem states that every matrix satisfies its own characteristic equation. This means we can replace
λ with
A:
A2+A−2KI=0
This is our 'reduction tool'. It allows us to express
A2 as:
A2=2KI−A
The Reduction Strategy
Now, let us look at the equation given in the problem:
A(A3+3I)=2I. If we distribute the
A, we get:
A4+3A=2I
We have an
A4 term. We know
A4=(A2)2. Substituting our reduction tool, we get:
A4=(2KI−A)2
Expanding this carefully using the identity
(x−y)2=x2−2xy+y2:
A4=(2KI)2−2(2KI)(A)+A2
A4=4K2I−4KA+A2
We still have an
A2 term, but we know exactly what to do with it. We substitute
A2=2KI−A once more:
A4=4K2I−4KA+(2KI−A)
A4=(4K2+2K)I−(4K+1)A
The Final Comparison
We take this simplified expression for
A4 and plug it back into our main equation
A4+3A=2I:
[(4K2+2K)I−(4K+1)A]+3A=2I
Let us combine the terms involving
A:
−(4K+1)A+3A=−(4K+1−3)A=−(4K−2)A
So, our equation becomes:
(4K2+2K)I−(4K−2)A=2I
Now, look at the right-hand side. It is just 2I. This means the coefficient of A on the left must be zero, because there is no A on the right.
Therefore,
4K−2=0. Solving this, we get
4K=2, which means:
K=21
The Takeaway
We have found our answer, K=21. But more importantly, look at what we achieved. We didn't just solve a problem; we navigated a complex algebraic landscape using the power of the Cayley-Hamilton theorem.
We turned a high-degree matrix polynomial into a simple linear comparison. This is the essence of JEE Advanced mathematics. It is not about how fast you can multiply; it is about how clearly you can see the structure of the problem.