Animated Solution for Mathematics - Inverse Trigonometric Functions: If the domain of the function f(x)=sin−1(x2−2x−21), is (−∞,α]∪[β,γ]∪[δ,∞), then α+β+γ+δ is equal to
Select Answer:
Visualized Solution
The Core Constraint of Inverse Sine
Function: f(x)=sin−1(x2−2x−21)
For sin−1(u) to be defined, the argument must lie in [−1,1].
Therefore: −1≤x2−2x−21≤1
Converting to Absolute Value
The inequality −1≤y1≤1 is equivalent to ∣y1∣≤1.
This implies ∣y∣≥1.
Substituting our expression: ∣x2−2x−2∣≥1
Splitting into Two Cases
∣x2−2x−2∣≥1 splits into two distinct conditions:
Case 1:x2−2x−2≥1
Case 2:x2−2x−2≤−1
Solving Case 1 (Part A)
Case 1:x2−2x−2≥1
Bring 1 to the left side:
x2−2x−3≥0
Solving Case 1 (Part B)
Factorizing the quadratic:
x2−3x+x−3≥0
(x−3)(x+1)≥0
Domain from Case 1
(x−3)(x+1)≥0
Using the wavy curve method, the solution is:
x∈(−∞,−1]∪[3,∞)
Solving Case 2 (Part A)
Case 2:x2−2x−2≤−1
Bring −1 to the left side:
x2−2x−1≤0
Solving Case 2 (Part B)
Finding the roots of x2−2x−1=0 using the quadratic formula:
x=2−(−2)±(−2)2−4(1)(−1)
x=22±4+4=22±22
x=1±2
Domain from Case 2
The roots are 1−2 and 1+2.
For x2−2x−1≤0, x must lie between the roots:
x∈[1−2,1+2]
Combining the Intervals
The complete domain is the union of solutions from Case 1 and Case 2:
Domain: (−∞,−1]∪[1−2,1+2]∪[3,∞)
Mapping to the Given Format
Given Domain format: (−∞,α]∪[β,γ]∪[δ,∞)
Comparing with our result:
α=−1
β=1−2
γ=1+2
δ=3
Calculating the Final Sum
We need to find the sum: α+β+γ+δ
Sum =−1+(1−2)+(1+2)+3
Notice that −2 and +2 cancel out.
Sum =−1+1+1+3=4
00:00 / 00:00
The Sigma Insight: Domain and Range of Inverse Trigonometric Functions
Solution Diagram
The Gatekeeper Function
Every function has its own personality, and the inverse sine function, sin−1(u), is a strict gatekeeper. It refuses to accept any input u that falls outside the closed interval [−1,1].
If you try to feed it a value like 2 or −5, it simply shuts down. So, our first mission is to ensure that the argument stays within these boundaries:
−1≤x2−2x−21≤1
This is our starting line.
The Algebraic Pivot
Staring at a reciprocal inequality can be intimidating. However, mathematics is often about finding a simpler perspective.
If the reciprocal of a number is trapped between −1 and 1, it implies that the magnitude of the number itself must be at least 1. Specifically:
∣x2−2x−2∣≥1
Because if the denominator were a small fraction, say 0.5, the reciprocal would be 2, which is outside our gatekeeper's limit. By shifting to the absolute value form, we have transformed a complex double inequality into a much cleaner, more manageable condition.
The Parabolic Dance
An absolute value inequality ∣u∣≥1 splits into two distinct realities: u≥1 or u≤−1. Let us explore these two cases.
Case 1:x2−2x−2≥1. Bringing the 1 to the left, we get x2−2x−3≥0.
Factoring this quadratic is a joy—it becomes (x−3)(x+1)≥0. Using the wavy curve method, we see the function is positive in the regions (−∞,−1]∪[3,∞).
Case 2:x2−2x−2≤−1. Bringing the −1 over, we get x2−2x−1≤0.
This quadratic does not factorize with simple integers, so we summon the quadratic formula:
x=2a−b±b2−4ac
Plugging in our coefficients, we find the roots to be 1±2. Since we need the region where the parabola is less than or equal to zero, our solution is the interval [1−2,1+2].
The Synthesis
We have our pieces. The domain is the union of these intervals:
(−∞,−1]∪[1−2,1+2]∪[3,∞)
Comparing this to the format (−∞,α]∪[β,γ]∪[δ,∞), we identify our constants: α=−1, β=1−2, γ=1+2, and δ=3.
The final step is the sum:
α+β+γ+δ=−1+(1−2)+(1+2)+3
Notice the elegance here? The −2 and +2 cancel out perfectly, leaving us with −1+1+1+3=4.