Analyzing the Setup
In the realm of formal logic, the implication operator p→q is a strict gatekeeper. It has one, and only one, way to be False: the antecedent must be True, and the consequent must be False.
We are given the statement p→(p∧∼q) and told that it is False. Applying the rule of implication, we conclude:
The Consequent's Dilemma
We now focus on the consequent (p∧∼q)=F. Since we have already established that p=T, we substitute this value into the expression:
The conjunction operator ∧ (AND) only returns True if both sides are True. Since the left side is already True, the result depends entirely on the right side. For the entire conjunction to be False, the term ∼q must be False:
The Final Negation
We have deduced that ∼q=F. The symbol ∼ represents the negation operator, which flips the truth value of the variable.
If the negation of q is False, then q itself must be the opposite. Therefore:
Final Conclusion
By systematically breaking down the logical structure, we have determined the truth values for the variables:
p=T
q=T
The final result is the pair (T,T).