Analyzing the Setup
Welcome, future engineers! Today, we are going to dissect a beautiful problem that tests not just your algebraic skills, but your ability to see the hidden structure within a quadratic equation.
We are given the equation 81x2+kx+256=0, and we are told that one root is the cube of the other. At first glance, this might seem like a daunting task—how do we find k without knowing the roots?
The secret lies in the profound symmetry of quadratic equations, specifically through the lens of Vieta's formulas.
The Power of Vieta's Formulas
Imagine you are standing before this equation. You have the coefficients a=81, b=k, and c=256.
The problem gives us a golden key: the roots are related. Let us define our first root as α. Consequently, the second root is α3.
Now, instead of panicking about finding the roots directly, we turn to the most powerful tool in our arsenal: the relationship between roots and coefficients. We know that for any quadratic equation ax2+bx+c=0, the product of the roots is given by:
Applying this to our equation, we get:
The Hunt for α
Now, look at the numbers. We have α4=81256. If you have been practicing your powers, you will immediately recognize that 256=44 and 81=34.
This is no coincidence! It is the problem setter rewarding your preparation. Thus, we have:
Taking the fourth root on both sides, we find α=±34. We have successfully cracked the code of the roots!
The Final Bridge to k
With the value of α in our hands, we can now hunt for k. Where does k hide? It is the coefficient of the linear term, which means it is tied to the sum of the roots.
Vieta's formula tells us that the sum of the roots is −ab. So:
Let us substitute α=34 into this expression. To make the calculation smoother, we factor out α:
Substituting α=34 and α2=916, we get:
Inside the bracket, 1+916 becomes 925. Now we have:
34⋅925=−81k⇒27100=−81k
Finally, multiplying both sides by −81:
Since 81=27⋅3, this simplifies to k=−100⋅3.
Final Result
We have arrived at our destination! The value of k is −300.
(Note: If we take α=−34, we obtain k=300. Depending on the context of the problem, both values are mathematically valid roots for the relationship provided.)