For the limit to be finite, the degree of the numerator ≤ degree of the denominator.
Degree of denominator is 1.
Therefore, the coefficient of x2 in the numerator must be zero: 1−a2=0
Solving for the Constant a
1−a2=0⟹a2=1⟹a=±1
Constraint: For a finite limit in (∞−∞) form, we must have a>0.
Thus, a=1.
Substituting a=1
Substitute a=1 into the simplified limit:
limx→∞x(1−x1+x21+1)−x+1=b
Dividing by x
Divide numerator and denominator by x:
limx→∞1−x1+x21+1−1+x1=b
Evaluating the Limit for b
As x→∞, x1→0 and x21→0.
b=1−0+0+1−1+0
b=1+1−1=−21
Final Ordered Pair (a,b)
The values are a=1 and b=−21.
The ordered pair (a,b) is (1,−21).
Key Takeaway: For a finite limit at infinity, ensure the numerator's degree does not exceed the denominator's degree.
00:00 / 00:00
The Sigma Insight: Evaluation of Limits & L'Hopital's Rule
Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are standing on a vast, open plain, watching two runners sprinting toward the horizon. One runner is x2−x+1, and the other is ax.
As x approaches infinity, both runners are moving incredibly fast, their speeds growing without bound. You are asked to find the gap between them, b, as they reach the horizon.
This is the essence of the limit:
x→∞lim(x2−x+1−ax)=b
This is a classic ∞−∞ indeterminate form. We cannot simply subtract infinity from infinity; we need to find the precise balance where the growth rates match.
The Surgical Tool
Rationalization
When we encounter square roots in limits, we use the surgical tool of rationalization. We treat the expression like a fraction with a hidden denominator of 1.
By multiplying the numerator and denominator by the conjugate, x2−x+1+ax, we invoke the difference of squares identity: (A−B)(A+B)=A2−B2.
The numerator transforms from a messy radical into a simple quadratic:
(x2−x+1)2−(ax)2=x2−x+1−a2x2
Grouping the terms, we get:
(1−a2)x2−x+1
The Soul of the Problem
Degree Analysis
Now, look at the denominator: x2−x+1+ax. As x becomes massive, the x2 inside the square root dominates, making the whole denominator behave like x+ax, which is proportional to x.
If our numerator still had an x2 term, the entire fraction would grow linearly with x, shooting off to infinity. But we are told the limit is a finite value b.
This forces a constraint upon us: the coefficient of the x2 term in the numerator must be zero. Thus:
1−a2=0⇒a=±1
We reject a=−1 because that would turn our subtraction into an addition, leading to ∞+∞. So, a=1 is our only path forward.
The Final Execution
With a=1 locked in, our expression simplifies to:
x2−x+1+x−x+1
To find b, we divide both the numerator and the denominator by x:
1−x1+x21+1−1+x1
As x→∞, the terms x1 and x21 vanish into zero. We are left with:
1+1−1=−21
The journey is complete. We have navigated the indeterminate form, rationalized the radical, balanced the degrees, and arrived at the elegant result of (a,b)=(1,−21).