The Beauty of the 1∞ Limit
Welcome, fellow traveler on the JEE journey! Today, we are going to demystify a problem that often intimidates students: the limit of a function raised to another function, specifically the 1∞ indeterminate form.
Imagine you are standing before the expression p=limx→0(xtanx)x21. At first glance, it looks like a mountain. But as we peel back the layers, you will see it is just a beautiful, elegant dance of algebra.
The Transformation
When we see a limit of the form 1∞, our first instinct should be to use the powerful exponential identity:
x→alim[f(x)]g(x)=elimx→ag(x)[f(x)−1]
This is our secret weapon. It transforms the terrifying exponential structure into a much more manageable limit in the exponent.
Here, our base f(x) is xtanx and our exponent g(x) is x21. Substituting these into our identity, we get:
The Taylor Series Microscope
Now, look at the exponent: x21(xtanx−1). If we simplify this, we get:
This is where many students reach for L'Hopital's rule, differentiating repeatedly until they get lost in a sea of trigonometric derivatives. But we are smarter than that!
We will use the Taylor series expansion for tanx near x=0, which is:
This expansion acts like a microscope, allowing us to see the behavior of the function right at the point of interest.
The Elegant Cancellation
Let's substitute this series into our expression:
Notice the magic? The x terms cancel out perfectly, leaving us with:
When we divide by x3, we are left with 31+higher order terms. As x approaches zero, all those higher order terms vanish into thin air, leaving us with exactly 31.
The Final Victory
So, our limit in the exponent is 31, which means p=e1/3. The question asks for 96logep.
Since logep=loge(e1/3)=31, the final calculation is simply:
There you have it! We navigated the 1∞ form, used the Taylor series to simplify the expression, and arrived at the answer with grace. Keep practicing, and remember: every complex problem is just a series of simple steps waiting to be discovered. The final answer is 32.