Analyzing the Setup
The expression provided is:
I=k=1∑98∫kk+1x(x+1)dx
The key to solving this is to decompose the rational function x(x+1)1. Whenever you see a product in the denominator, your first instinct should be partial fraction decomposition.
We can rewrite the integrand as:
x(x+1)1=x1−x+11
This transformation turns a complex-looking term into two simple, manageable components. This is the power of mathematical insight—transforming complexity into simplicity.
The Telescoping Magic
Now that we have our decomposed integrand, the integration becomes trivial. We evaluate the integral as follows:
∫kk+1(x1−x+11)dx=[ln∣x∣−ln∣x+1∣]kk+1
Using the properties of logarithms, this simplifies to
ln(x+1x). Applying the limits from
k to
k+1, we obtain:
ln(k+2k+1)−ln(k+1k)
Let us define a function f(k)=ln(k+1k). Our integral now takes the form f(k+1)−f(k).
When we sum this from
k=1 to
98, we get:
[f(2)−f(1)]+[f(3)−f(2)]+⋯+[f(99)−f(98)]
This is a telescoping series. The terms cancel out like falling dominoes, leaving us with only f(99)−f(1).
Final Calculation
The sum collapses into a single, elegant result:
I=ln(10099)−ln(21)
Simplifying the logarithmic expression:
I=ln(1/299/100)=ln(5099)
The Inequality Battle
We have our value I=ln(5099). To compare this with other values, we use the standard inequality ln(1+x)<x for x>0.
Rewrite the argument as:
5099=1+5049
Now, our expression is ln(1+5049). By setting x=5049, the inequality ln(1+5049)<5049 holds true.
This confirms that I<5049. Remember, every complex problem is just a sequence of simple steps; keep practicing to master these patterns.