Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are standing on the precipice of a mathematical landscape, looking at the equation λx2−(λ+3)x+3=0. At first glance, it looks like a standard quadratic, but it hides a secret.
We are given a condition on its roots, α and β, specifically that α1−β1=31, with the constraint that α<β. Our mission is to uncover the values of λ that make this possible.
The Power of Vieta's Formulas
Whenever we face a quadratic equation, our first instinct should be to invoke the wisdom of Vieta. We know that for any quadratic ax2+bx+c=0, the sum of the roots is −b/a and the product is c/a.
Applying this to our equation, we find:
These two expressions are the keys to the kingdom. They encapsulate everything we need to know about the roots without ever needing to solve for them individually.
The Algebraic Bridge
Now, let's look at the condition α1−β1=31. By taking a common denominator, we get:
This is a breakthrough! It tells us that the difference of the roots, β−α, is directly proportional to the product of the roots.
Substituting our product αβ=λ3, we find that β−α=λ1.
The Dance of λ
We now have the sum, the product, and the difference of the roots. We use the fundamental identity: (β−α)2=(α+β)2−4αβ.
Substituting our known values, we get:
Multiplying through by λ2 (which we know is non-zero), we get 1=(λ+3)2−12λ. Expanding this, we arrive at 1=λ2+6λ+9−12λ, which simplifies beautifully to:
Final Verification
Factorizing this quadratic is a joy: (λ−2)(λ−4)=0. This gives us two candidates: λ=2 and λ=4.
For λ=2, the equation becomes 2x2−5x+3=0, with roots 1 and 1.5. Since 1<1.5, this is valid.
For λ=4, the equation becomes 4x2−7x+3=0, with roots 0.75 and 1. Since 0.75<1, this is also valid.
Both values hold up under scrutiny! The sum of all possible values of λ is 2+4=6.