The chemistry of lanthanides is a fascinating interplay of electronic configurations, thermodynamic stability, and redox potentials. In this problem, we are tasked with evaluating two statements regarding Cerium (Ce), a prominent member of the lanthanide series. Let's break down the concepts step-by-step to uncover the truth.
Analyzing the Electronic Configuration
To understand the behavior of Cerium, we must first look at its ground state electronic configuration. Cerium has an atomic number of Z=58.
Its electronic configuration is:
Ce=[Xe]4f15d16s2
When Cerium loses its four outermost electrons, it forms the
Ce4+ ion. The configuration becomes:
Ce4+=[Xe]4f0
Notice that Ce4+ achieves the completely empty 4f0 state, which corresponds to the highly stable noble gas configuration of Xenon. Intuitively, one might assume that this makes Ce4+ the most stable state for Cerium. However, aqueous chemistry has a different story to tell.
The Universal Stability of the +3 State
Despite the apparent stability of the noble gas core in Ce4+, the +3 oxidation state is universally the most stable state for all lanthanides, including Cerium.
When Cerium is in the
+3 state, its configuration is:
Ce3+=[Xe]4f1
The stability of the +3 state is governed by a complex balance of ionization enthalpies and hydration enthalpies in aqueous solutions. Because Ce3+ is thermodynamically more stable, any Cerium ion in the +4 state will have a strong natural tendency to gain an electron and revert to the +3 state.
Decoding the Standard Reduction Potential
This brings us to Statement I, which provides the standard reduction potential:
ECe4+/Ce3+∘=+1.74 V
A positive
E∘ value indicates that the reduction reaction is spontaneous. A value as high as
+1.74 V means that
Ce4+ is exceptionally eager to gain an electron:
Ce4++e−⟶Ce3+
Because Ce4+ forces other substances to lose electrons so it can be reduced, it acts as a powerful oxidizing agent. This high positive value is a well-documented factual data point, making Statement I absolutely correct.
The Final Verdict
Now, let's evaluate Statement II, which claims that Cerium is more stable in the Ce4+ state than the Ce3+ state.
As we just established, the strong tendency of Ce4+ to reduce to Ce3+ (evidenced by the high E∘ value) directly proves that Ce3+ is the lower-energy, more stable state. If Ce4+ were truly more stable, it wouldn't act as such a strong oxidizing agent to escape that state!
Therefore, Statement II is incorrect.
By combining these insights, we can confidently conclude that Statement I is correct, but Statement II is incorrect, leading us to our final answer.