Coordination chemistry is a fascinating world where the rules of classical bonding are beautifully bent. In this problem, we are tasked with verifying two statements regarding the hybridization and magnetic properties of five distinct coordination complexes. Let's embark on this journey by analyzing each complex through the lens of Valence Bond Theory (VBT) and Crystal Field Theory (CFT).
Analyzing Statement I
The Inner Orbital Complexes
Our first candidate is the hexacyanidomanganate(III) ion, [Mn(CN)6]3−. The central manganese atom is in a +3 oxidation state, which leaves it with a 3d4 electronic configuration. The cyanide ion (CN−) is a notoriously strong field ligand. It exerts a massive crystal field splitting energy (Δo), which forces the electrons to pair up in the lower energy t2g orbitals rather than jumping to the higher eg orbitals. This pairing leaves exactly two inner 3d orbitals vacant. These two d orbitals mix with one 4s and three 4p orbitals to yield a d2sp3 hybridization.
Next, we look at the hexacyanidoferrate(III) ion, [Fe(CN)6]3−. Iron is also in a +3 state, giving it a 3d5 configuration. Just like before, the strong cyanide ligand forces maximum pairing. The five electrons occupy the inner orbitals, leaving two 3d orbitals empty. Consequently, it also undergoes d2sp3 hybridization.
Our third complex is [Co(C2O4)3]3−. Cobalt is in a +3 state, meaning it has a 3d6 configuration. Here lies a classic trap! While the oxalate ion (C2O42−) is generally considered a weak field ligand, it behaves as a strong field ligand when paired with Co3+. This anomaly occurs because the high charge density of Co3+ pulls the ligands closer, increasing the splitting energy Δo beyond the pairing energy. Thus, all six electrons pair up, leaving two inner d orbitals empty, resulting in d2sp3 hybridization.
Since all three complexes are indeed d2sp3 hybridized, Statement I is absolutely true.
Analyzing Statement II
The Outer Orbital Complexes
Now, let's shift our focus to Statement II, starting with the hexafluoridoferrate(III) ion, [FeF6]3−. Iron is in a +3 state (3d5). However, the fluoride ion (F−) is a weak field ligand. It cannot overcome the pairing energy, so the electrons remain unpaired, occupying all five 3d orbitals singly. Because no inner d orbitals are available, the complex must utilize the outer 4d orbitals for bonding, leading to an sp3d2 hybridization. With 5 unpaired electrons, this complex is highly paramagnetic.
Finally, we examine the hexachloridomanganate(III) ion, [MnCl6]3−. Manganese is in a +3 state (3d4). The chloride ion (Cl−) is another weak field ligand, so no pairing occurs. The four electrons remain unpaired. Although one inner 3d orbital is empty, an octahedral geometry strictly requires two empty d orbitals to form a d2sp3 hybrid. Since it only has one, it is forced to use the outer 4d orbitals, resulting in an sp3d2 hybridization. It possesses exactly 4 unpaired electrons.
Since [MnCl6]3− has 4 unpaired electrons and [FeF6]3− has 5 unpaired electrons, Statement II is also perfectly true.
The Final Verdict
Both statements stand up to rigorous chemical scrutiny. The interplay between the metal's oxidation state and the ligand's field strength dictates the entire geometry and magnetic behavior of these beautiful molecules. Therefore, the correct option is (d).