Imagine you are shrinking down to the atomic level and observing a diatomic molecule, like oxygen (O2) or nitrogen (N2). What does it look like? It resembles a tiny dumbbell—two spherical atoms connected by a rigid chemical bond.
This tiny dumbbell isn't just sitting still; it's constantly moving. It can fly through space, which we call translational motion, and it can tumble and spin around, which we call rotational motion.
Maxwell's Equipartition Theorem
Let's tackle Statement I. In the world of thermodynamics, there is a beautiful and democratic rule known as Maxwell's Equipartition Theorem.
This theorem states that in thermal equilibrium, the total energy of a system is shared equally among all its active modes of motion, or degrees of freedom.
Because the theorem applies universally to all active modes, the rotational energy absolutely obeys Maxwell's distribution. Therefore, Statement I is perfectly true.
Counting the Degrees of Freedom
Now, let's investigate Statement II. To find the energy, we first need to count the ways our molecule can move.
A rigid diatomic molecule can move along the x, y, and z axes. That gives us 3 translational degrees of freedom (ftrans=3).
It can also rotate. However, rotation along the axis connecting the two atoms (the internuclear axis) has a negligible moment of inertia, so it doesn't count. It can only meaningfully rotate about the two axes perpendicular to the bond. This gives us 2 rotational degrees of freedom (frot=2).
In total, the molecule has f=3+2=5 degrees of freedom.
The Energy Showdown
According to the equipartition theorem, every single degree of freedom gets an equal slice of the energy pie, exactly 21kBT, where kB is the Boltzmann constant and T is the absolute temperature.
Let's calculate the translational kinetic energy. Since there are 3 translational modes, we multiply:
KEtrans=3×21kBT=23kBT
Next, let's calculate the rotational kinetic energy. With 2 rotational modes, we get:
KErot=2×21kBT=kBT
The Final Verdict
Now, we simply compare the two energies. Is the rotational energy equal to the translational energy?
Clearly, 23kBT is not equal to kBT. The translational energy is 50% greater than the rotational energy!
This means Statement II is completely false.
Our final conclusion is clear: Statement I is true, but Statement II is false, making option (c) the correct choice. Physics is all about keeping track of the details, and here, counting the degrees of freedom leads us straight to the truth!