Animated Solution for Mathematics - Matrices and Determinants: For some a, b, let
f(x)=∣a+xsinxaa11+xsinx1bbb+xsinx∣x=0, limx→0f(x)=λ+μa+νb. Then
(λ+μ+ν)2 is equal to:
Select Answer:
Visualized Solution
The Function f(x)
Given function: f(x)=a+xsinxaa11+xsinx1bbb+xsinx
We need to evaluate the limit as x→0.
Standard Limit limx→0xsinx
Recall the fundamental limit: limx→0xsinx=1
This will simplify the entries of the determinant.
Substituting the Limit Value
Substitute xsinx→1 into the matrix.
The determinant L=a+1aa121bbb+1
Row Operation R1→R1−R2
Apply row operation: R1→R1−R2
R1 becomes: (a+1)−a=1, 1−2=−1, b−b=0
L=1aa−1210bb+1
Row Operation R2→R2−R3
Apply row operation: R2→R2−R3
R2 becomes: a−a=0, 2−1=1, b−(b+1)=−1
L=10a−1110−1b+1
Expanding along R1
Expand L along the first row (R1).
L=1⋅11−1b+1−(−1)⋅0a−1b+1+0
Simplifying the Expression
First minor: 1(b+1)−(−1)(1)=b+2
Second minor: 0(b+1)−(−1)(a)=a
L=1(b+2)+1(a)=a+b+2
Comparing with λ+μa+νb
Given: limx→0f(x)=λ+μa+νb
We found: L=2+1⋅a+1⋅b
Finding λ,μ,ν
Constant term: λ=2
Coefficient of a: μ=1
Coefficient of b: ν=1
Final Numerical Value
Calculate (λ+μ+ν)2
Substitute values: (2+1+1)2
=42=16
00:00 / 00:00
The Sigma Insight: Properties of Determinants
Solution Diagram
Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are standing before a complex, intimidating 3×3 determinant. It looks like a fortress of variables and trigonometric functions, designed to block your path. But in the world of JEE Advanced, every fortress has a secret door.
Our function is defined as:
f(x)=a+xsinxaa11+xsinx1bbb+xsinx
At first glance, the term xsinx might seem like a nuisance. However, we are looking for the limit as x→0. This is the moment where the chaos settles.
We know the fundamental standard limit:
x→0limxsinx=1
This is our magic key. By substituting this value, the entire matrix transforms into a simple, constant-filled structure. Let's call this simplified determinant L:
L=a+1aa121bbb+1
The Elegance of Simplification
Now, we could expand this determinant directly, but that would be like trying to cut down a tree with a butter knife. Instead, let's use the power of row operations. Our goal is to create zeros, which make the expansion process trivial.
First, let's apply R1→R1−R2. The first row becomes (a+1)−a=1, 1−2=−1, and b−b=0. Our matrix now looks like this:
L=1aa−1210bb+1
See how much cleaner that is? But we can do better. Let's apply R2→R2−R3. The second row becomes a−a=0, 2−1=1, and b−(b+1)=−1.
Now we have:
L=10a−1110−1b+1
The Final Expansion
Now, the expansion is a breeze. Expanding along the first row (R1), we get:
L=1⋅11−1b+1−(−1)⋅0a−1b+1+0
Let's calculate those minors carefully. The first minor is 1(b+1)−(−1)(1)=b+2. The second minor is 0(b+1)−(−1)(a)=a.
Adding them together, we get:
L=(b+2)+a=a+b+2
The Comparison
The problem tells us that $\lim_{x \to 0} f(x) = \lambda + \mu a +
u b$. We have found that our limit is 2+1⋅a+1⋅b. By comparing the coefficients, we find:
λ=2,μ=1,u=1
Finally, we need to calculate $(\lambda + \mu +
u)^2$. Substituting our values, we get:
(2+1+1)2=42=16
And there it is! The fortress has fallen. By using the standard limit and the elegance of row operations, we turned a terrifying problem into a simple, satisfying victory.