This problem is a beautiful reminder of why we must never blindly trust memorized formulas in physics. It tests your fundamental understanding of how a Vernier caliper is constructed and calibrated.
Decoding the Main Scale
Let's start by looking at the main scale
Between the 0 and 1 cm marks, there are exactly 10 divisions. This is standard. It tells us that one Main Scale Division (MSD) is simply:
The Vernier Trap (Figure 1)
Now, look at Figure 1
This figure shows the zero-error state, where the jaws of the caliper are fully closed. In a standard Vernier caliper, 10 Vernier Scale Divisions (VSD) coincide with 9 Main Scale Divisions. But look closely at this specific instrument!
The 10th division of the Vernier scale aligns perfectly with the 7th division of the main scale. This is the catch! We must calculate the length of one VSD based on this specific geometry:
1 VSD=107 MSD=0.7×0.1 cm=0.07 cm
With this, we can find the true Least Count (LC) of this instrument. The least count is the smallest measurable difference, which is the difference between one main scale division and one Vernier scale division:
LC=0.1 cm−0.07 cm=0.03 cm
Taking the Measurement (Figure 2)
Now we move to Figure 2 to take the actual measurement of the tube's diameter.
First, we find the Main Scale Reading (MSR). We look at where the zero mark of the Vernier scale lands. It has crossed the 1st mark (0.1 cm) but hasn't reached the 2nd mark (0.2 cm). Therefore:
Next, we find the Vernier Scale Reading (VSR) by identifying which Vernier division perfectly coincides with any main scale division. Scanning across, we see that the very 1st Vernier division aligns perfectly with the 2nd main scale mark. Thus:
The Final Calculation
We now plug these values into our universal reading formula:
Total Reading=MSR+(VSR×LC)
Total Reading=0.1 cm+(1×0.03 cm)=0.13 cm
Alternative Geometric Method:
If you look at Figure 2 purely geometrically, the distance from the main scale zero to the Vernier zero is exactly the distance to the 2nd main scale mark minus the length of 1 Vernier division.
Reading=0.2 cm−0.07 cm=0.13 cm
Both methods yield the exact same result, proving the elegance of the Vernier principle. The correct option is (C).