The enthalpy change for a reaction does not depend upon the
(a) physical state of reactants and prod

Q: Why does the physical state affect the enthalpy change?

Different physical states (solid, liquid, gas) have different internal energies due to varying intermolecular forces. For example, turning liquid water into steam requires extra energy (latent heat of vaporization). Therefore, a reaction producing a gas will have a different $\Delta H$ than the same reaction producing a liquid.

Q: How does temperature affect the enthalpy of a reaction?

The enthalpy of a substance changes with temperature based on its heat capacity ($C_p$). If you carry out a reaction at a higher temperature, the initial and final enthalpies shift. This temperature dependence is calculated using Kirchhoff's equation: $\Delta H_{T_2} = \Delta H_{T_1} + \Delta C_p(T_2 - T_1)$.

Q: What exactly is a 'path function' if enthalpy isn't one?

A path function depends on the specific route taken to go from the initial to the final state. The most common examples in thermodynamics are Work ($W$) and Heat ($q$). The amount of work done depends heavily on how the process is carried out (e.g., reversible vs. irreversible expansion).

Q: Does adding a catalyst change the enthalpy of the reaction?

No! A catalyst provides an alternative pathway (intermediate steps) with a lower activation energy, making the reaction faster. However, because enthalpy is a state function, the overall $\Delta H$ between the reactants and products remains exactly the same.

Q: Why is Hess's Law so important in chemistry?

Hess's Law is incredibly powerful because it allows us to calculate the enthalpy change of complex reactions that are too dangerous, too slow, or impossible to measure directly in a lab. We can simply add up the $\Delta H$ values of known intermediate reactions to find the unknown $\Delta H$.

Question

The enthalpy change for a reaction does not depend upon the

Options:

(A) physical state of reactants and products

(B) use of different reactants for the same product

(C) nature of intermediate reaction steps

(D) difference in initial or final temperatures of involved substances

Sigma Percentile · Accepted Answer

### The Mountain Climber's Analogy

Imagine you are standing at the base of a massive mountain (your initial state, the reactants) and your goal is to reach the summit (your final state, the products). You have two choices: you can take a steep, direct helicopter ride straight to the top, or you can hike up a winding trail, setting up multiple base camps (intermediate steps) along the way.

Regardless of how you get there, once you are standing on the summit, your change in altitude is exactly the same. In the world of chemical thermodynamics, this altitude is analogous to **Enthalpy ($H$)**. Because enthalpy is a **state function**, the overall change in enthalpy ($\Delta H$) depends *only* on where you started and where you finished. It is completely blind to the path you took to get there.

### Hess's Law: The Magic of State Functions

This beautiful independence from the path is formally codified in **Hess's Law of Constant Heat Summation**. Hess's Law states that if a reaction takes place in several steps, then its standard reaction enthalpy is the sum of the standard enthalpies of the intermediate reactions into which the overall reaction may be divided at the same temperature.

Mathematically, if a direct reaction has an enthalpy change of $\Delta H_{	ext{direct}}$, and an alternative multi-step pathway has enthalpy changes of $\Delta H_1$ and $\Delta H_2$, then:

$$\Delta H_{	ext{direct}} = \Delta H_1 + \Delta H_2$$

This means the **nature of the intermediate reaction steps** has absolutely zero effect on the final $\Delta H$ of the overall process.

### Why the Other Options Matter

Let's critically evaluate why the other options *do* affect the enthalpy change:

1. **Physical State of Reactants and Products:** The enthalpy of a substance changes drastically with its phase. For example, converting liquid water to water vapor requires the latent heat of vaporization. Therefore, the $\Delta H$ for producing $H_2O(l)$ is different from producing $H_2O(g)$.

2. **Use of Different Reactants:** Enthalpy change is $\Delta H = H_{	ext{products}} - H_{	ext{reactants}}$. If you change the reactants, you are fundamentally changing the initial state ($H_{	ext{reactants}}$), which will inevitably alter the overall $\Delta H$.

3. **Difference in Temperatures:** Enthalpy is highly temperature-dependent. The heat capacity of the system dictates how much energy is required to raise its temperature. This relationship is governed by **Kirchhoff's Equation**:

$$\Delta H_{T_2} = \Delta H_{T_1} + \Delta C_p(T_2 - T_1)$$

### The Final Verdict

By eliminating the factors that actively alter the initial or final states of the system, we are left with the one factor that merely describes the journey: the intermediate steps. Because enthalpy is a state function, it simply does not care about the journey. Therefore, the enthalpy change of a reaction does not depend upon the nature of intermediate reaction steps.

Animated Solution for Chemistry - Chemical Thermodynamics: The enthalpy change for a reaction does not depend upon the

Select Answer:

Visualized Solution

\text{Understanding Enthalpy Change } (\Delta H)

\text{State Function vs Path Function}

\text{Hess's Law of Constant Heat Summation}

\text{Evaluating the Options}

\text{Conclusion}

The Sigma Insight: Enthalpy and Hess's Law

The Mountain Climber's Analogy

Hess's Law

Why the Other Options Matter

The Final Verdict

Similar Questions

If at 298 K, the bond energies of C—H, C—C, C=C and H—H bonds are respectively 414, 347, 615 and 435 kJ mol $^{- 1}$ , the value of enthalpy change for the reaction, $H_{2} C = CH_{2} (g) + H_{2} (g) ⟶ H_{3} C — CH_{3} (g)$ at 298 K will be

Choose the reaction(s) from the following options, for which the standard enthalpy of reaction is equal to the standard enthalpy of formation.

The enthalpies of combustion of carbon and carbon monoxide are $- 393.5$ and $- 283 kJ mol^{- 1}$ , respectively. The enthalpy of formation of carbon monoxide per mole is

If enthalpy of atomisation for $Br_{2} (l)$ is $x kJ/mol$ and bond enthalpy for $Br_{2}$ is $y kJ/mol$ , the relation between them

Lattice enthalpy and enthalpy of solution of NaCl are $788 kJ mol^{- 1}$ and $4 kJ mol^{- 1}$ , respectively. The hydration enthalpy of NaCl is

The heat of combustion of ethanol into carbon dioxides and water is $- 327 kcal$ at constant pressure. The heat evolved (in cal) at constant volume and $2 7^{\circ} C$ (if all gases behave ideally) is ( $R = 2 cal mol^{- 1} K^{- 1}$ ) .........

For the reaction, $C_{2} H_{6} ⟶ C_{2} H_{4} + H_{2}$ the reaction enthalpy $Δ_{r} H = \dots\dots\dots kJ mol^{- 1}$ (Round off to the nearest integer). [Given : Bond enthalpies in $kJ mol^{- 1}$ : $C - C = 347, C = C = 611; C - H = 414; H - H = 436$ ]

The standard enthalpy of formation of $NH_{3}$ is $- 46.0 kJ mol^{- 1}$ . If the enthalpy of formation of $H_{2}$ from its atoms is $- 436 kJ mol^{- 1}$ and that of $N_{2}$ is $- 712 kJ mol^{- 1}$ , the average bond enthalpy of N—H bond in $NH_{3}$ is

The heats of combustion of carbon and carbon monoxide are $- 393.5$ and $- 283.5 kJ mol^{- 1}$ , respectively. The heat of formation (in kJ) of carbon monoxide per mole is

Consider the reaction, $4 NO_{2} (g) + O_{2} (g) \to 2 N_{2} O_{5} (g)$ , $Δ_{r} H = - 111 kJ$ . If $N_{2} O_{5} (s)$ is formed instead of $N_{2} O_{5} (g)$ in the above reaction, the $Δ_{r} H$ value will be (Given, $Δ H$ of sublimation for $N_{2} O_{5}$ is $54 kJ mol^{- 1}$ )