Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are in a laboratory, holding a solid cylinder. You take out a standard meter scale and carefully measure its dimensions. You find the diameter D to be 12.6 cm and the height h to be 34.2 cm. Because you are using a meter scale, your measurements are limited by its least count, which is 0.1 cm. Therefore, your readings are recorded as D=12.6±0.1 cm and h=34.2±0.1 cm.
Our goal is to calculate the volume of this cylinder and, more importantly, to express it with the correct significant figures and uncertainty. This is a classic problem that tests not just your ability to plug numbers into a formula, but your understanding of how precision propagates through mathematical operations.
The Master Equation for Volume
The volume of a cylinder is given by the well-known geometric formula V=πr2h. Since our measurement is in terms of diameter D, we substitute r=2D to get:
V=4πD2h
Let's first calculate the central value of the volume by substituting the measured values without their uncertainties:
V=4π×(12.6)2×(34.2)
When you punch this into a calculator, you get a highly precise-looking number: V=4262.22 cm3. But wait! Is our result really that precise?
The Art of Significant Figures
This is where the rules of significant figures come into play. A chain is only as strong as its weakest link, and a calculated result is only as precise as its least precise input.
Look at our measured values: 12.6 has exactly three significant figures, and 34.2 also has exactly three significant figures. According to the rules of multiplication, our final result must be restricted to the same number of significant figures as the input with the fewest significant figures.
Therefore, we must round 4262.22 to three significant figures. The first three digits are 4,2, and 6. The next digit is 2, which is less than 5, so we round down. This gives us our properly rounded central volume:
V=4260 cm3
Propagating the Errors
Now, we need to figure out the uncertainty, or absolute error, in our volume. When physical quantities are multiplied or divided, their fractional (or relative) errors add up. Furthermore, if a quantity is raised to a power, its fractional error is multiplied by that power.
Applying this rule to our volume formula V=4πD2h, we get the error propagation equation:
VΔV=2(DΔD)+hΔh
Notice that the constant 4π disappears because exact constants have zero uncertainty. Let's substitute our values into this equation:
VΔV=2×12.60.1+34.20.1
Calculating the individual fractions gives:
VΔV=0.0158+0.0029=0.0187
To find the absolute error ΔV, we multiply this total fractional error by the unrounded volume. It is crucial to use the unrounded volume (4262.22) here to prevent intermediate rounding errors from skewing the final uncertainty.
ΔV=0.01879×4262.22≈79.7 cm3
Final Calculation and Conclusion
In experimental physics, absolute errors represent the bounds of our uncertainty. It doesn't make sense to state an uncertainty with high precision. By convention, we round the absolute error to one significant figure, or to match the decimal place of the least precise measurement.
Rounding 79.7 gives us an absolute error of 80 cm3. Finally, we combine our rounded central volume with our rounded absolute error to state the final result:
V=4260±80 cm3
This perfectly matches option (b). The beauty of this problem lies in the seamless integration of geometry, error analysis, and the strict discipline of significant figures.