The Challenge of Aromatic Substitution
Normally, benzene rings are highly electron-rich and repel nucleophiles
Furthermore, the carbon-halogen bond in haloarenes acquires a partial double bond character due to resonance. This makes it incredibly difficult to break the bond and perform a nucleophilic substitution.
The Magic of Electron-Withdrawing Groups
However, if we attach an electron-withdrawing group (EWG) like a nitro group (−NO2) to the benzene ring, the scenario changes dramatically
The −NO2 group pulls electron density away from the ring through both the inductive effect (−I) and the resonance effect (−R).
When a nucleophile attacks the carbon bearing the halogen, a negatively charged intermediate called the Meisenheimer complex is formed. The rate of the reaction depends entirely on the stability of this carbanion intermediate.
Position Matters
Ortho and Para
The stabilization provided by the −NO2 group is most effective when it is located at the ortho or para positions relative to the halogen. In these positions, the negative charge of the intermediate can be delocalized directly onto the oxygen atoms of the nitro group.
Analyzing the Compounds
Let's evaluate our four compounds based on this principle:
1. Compound (i) is simple chlorobenzene
It has no electron-withdrawing groups to stabilize the intermediate. It will be the slowest to react.
2. Compound (ii) has one −NO2 group at the para position. This provides significant stabilization, making it faster than chlorobenzene.
3. Compound (iii) has two −NO2 groups (one ortho, one para). The combined electron-withdrawing effect of two groups makes the intermediate even more stable, further increasing the reaction rate.
4. Compound (iv) is 2,4,6-trinitrochlorobenzene. It boasts three −NO2 groups (two ortho, one para). This provides maximum stabilization to the carbanion intermediate, making it the most reactive of the bunch.
The Final Verdict
By simply counting the number of strongly electron-withdrawing −NO2 groups at the ortho and para positions, we can confidently determine the order of reactivity
The correct increasing order is (i) < (ii) < (iii) < (iv).
This perfectly matches option (d).