Animated Solution for Mathematics - Complex Numbers: Consider the following two statements : \nStatement I : For any two non-zero complex numbers z1,z2, (∣z1∣+∣z2∣)∣z1∣z1+∣z2∣z2≤2(∣z1∣+∣z2∣), and \nStatement II : If x,y,z are three distinct complex numbers and a,b,c are three positive real numbers such that ∣y−z∣a=∣z−x∣b=∣x−y∣c, then y−za2+z−xb2+x−yc2=1. \nBetween the above two statements,
These represent unit vectors in the complex plane.
Therefore, ∣u1∣=1 and ∣u2∣=1.
Applying Triangle Inequality
Using the Triangle Inequality: ∣za+zb∣≤∣za∣+∣zb∣
Applying this to our unit vectors: ∣u1+u2∣≤∣u1∣+∣u2∣
Simplifying the Inequality
Substitute the magnitudes: ∣u1∣=1 and ∣u2∣=1
∣z1∣z1+∣z2∣z2≤1+1
∣z1∣z1+∣z2∣z2≤2
Concluding Statement I
Multiply both sides by (∣z1∣+∣z2∣):
(∣z1∣+∣z2∣)∣z1∣z1+∣z2∣z2≤2(∣z1∣+∣z2∣)
Conclusion: Statement I is Correct.
Analyzing Statement II
Statement II: Given ∣y−z∣a=∣z−x∣b=∣x−y∣c
Let's visualize x,y,z as vertices of a triangle.
Setting up a Constant
Let ∣y−z∣a=∣z−x∣b=∣x−y∣c=λ
Squaring all terms:
a2=λ∣y−z∣2
b2=λ∣z−x∣2
c2=λ∣x−y∣2
Using Conjugate Properties
Recall the property: ∣w∣2=wwˉ
Applying this to ∣y−z∣2:
∣y−z∣2=(y−z)(yˉ−zˉ)
Rearranging the First Term
Substitute back into the equation for a2:
a2=λ(y−z)(yˉ−zˉ)
Divide by (y−z):
y−za2=λ(yˉ−zˉ)
Expressions for Other Terms
By symmetry, we can write:
z−xb2=λ(zˉ−xˉ)
x−yc2=λ(xˉ−yˉ)
Summing the Terms
Summing all three terms:
∑=λ(yˉ−zˉ)+λ(zˉ−xˉ)+λ(xˉ−yˉ)
∑=λ(yˉ−zˉ+zˉ−xˉ+xˉ−yˉ)
Final Verdict
The terms inside the bracket cancel out:
∑=λ(0)=0
Statement II claims the sum is 1.
Conclusion: Statement II is Incorrect.
00:00 / 00:00
The Sigma Insight: Algebraic Operations on Complex Numbers
Solution Diagram
Analyzing the Unit Vector Insight
Let us look at Statement I: (∣z1∣+∣z2∣)∣z1∣z1+∣z2∣z2≤2(∣z1∣+∣z2∣).
Define u1=∣z1∣z1 and u2=∣z2∣z2. These are unit vectors residing on the unit circle, meaning their magnitudes are fixed at exactly 1.
The inequality simplifies to ∣u1+u2∣≤2. This is a direct application of the Triangle Inequality, which states that the magnitude of the sum of two vectors is less than or equal to the sum of their individual magnitudes.
Since ∣u1∣=1 and ∣u2∣=1, we have:
∣u1+u2∣≤∣u1∣+∣u2∣=1+1=2
Multiplying both sides by the positive real number (∣z1∣+∣z2∣) preserves the inequality. Thus, Statement I is correct.
The Geometric Trap
Now, consider Statement II. We are given three distinct complex numbers x,y,z and positive real numbers a,b,c such that:
∣y−z∣a=∣z−x∣b=∣x−y∣c=λ
This implies the following relationships for the squares of the constants:
a2=λ∣y−z∣2,b2=λ∣z−x∣2,c2=λ∣x−y∣2
We must evaluate the expression y−za2+z−xb2+x−yc2.
The Algebraic Resolution
Recall the fundamental property of complex numbers: the square of the magnitude is the product of the number and its conjugate, ∣w∣2=wwˉ.
Applying this to the first term, we get:
a2=λ(y−z)(yˉ−zˉ)
Dividing by (y−z) yields λ(yˉ−zˉ). By symmetry, the other terms in the expression simplify to λ(zˉ−xˉ) and λ(xˉ−yˉ).
Summing these terms results in:
λ[(yˉ−zˉ)+(zˉ−xˉ)+(xˉ−yˉ)]=λ[0]=0
The sum collapses to zero due to the telescoping nature of the conjugates. Since Statement II claims the sum is 1, Statement II is incorrect.