This question is a fantastic conceptual marathon that tests your grip on multiple facets of ionic equilibrium. Instead of just solving one numerical, we are tasked with evaluating four distinct statements. Let's break them down one by one and uncover the chemistry behind each.
The Mixture's pH
Statement I asks us to find the pH of a mixture containing 400 mL of 0.1 M H2SO4 and 400 mL of 0.1 M NaOH.
The first thing to notice is that sulfuric acid (H2SO4) is a dibasic acid. This means each mole of H2SO4 provides two moles of H+ ions. Let's calculate the millimoles of H+ and OH− available for neutralization:
nH+=400 mL×0.1 M×2=80 mmol
nOH−=400 mL×0.1 M×1=40 mmol
Clearly, H+ is in excess, making OH− the limiting reagent. After the neutralization reaction, the remaining millimoles of H+ will be 80−40=40 mmol.
The total volume of the mixture is now 400+400=800 mL. We can find the final concentration of H+:
[H+]=800 mL40 mmol=201 M
Now, we calculate the pH:
Using logarithm properties, log20=log(2×10)=log2+log10=0.301+1=1.301.
This matches the statement perfectly. Statement I is True.
The Heat of Water
Statement II claims that the ionic product of water (Kw) is temperature dependent.
Think about the auto-ionization of water:
Breaking the covalent bonds in water to form ions requires energy, making this an endothermic process (ΔH>0). According to Le-Chatelier's principle, if we increase the temperature of an endothermic reaction, the equilibrium shifts in the forward direction to absorb the excess heat.
As the reaction shifts forward, the concentrations of H+ and OH− increase, which directly increases the value of Kw=[H+][OH−]. Therefore, Kw is indeed highly dependent on temperature. Statement II is True.
The Weak Acid's Secret
Statement III presents a weak monobasic acid with Ka=10−5 and a pH of 5. We need to verify if its degree of dissociation (α) is 50%.
A pH of 5 immediately tells us that [H+]=10−5 M. For a weak acid HA, the concentration of H+ is given by Cα. So, Cα=10−5.
The exact expression for the acid dissociation constant is:
We can cleverly rewrite this to use our known value of Cα:
Substitute Ka=10−5 and Cα=10−5 into the equation:
The 10−5 terms cancel out beautifully, leaving us with:
Cross-multiplying gives 1−α=α, which simplifies to 2α=1, or α=0.5. Converting this to a percentage, we get exactly 50%. Statement III is True.
The Common Ion Fallacy
Statement IV asserts that Le-Chatelier's principle is not applicable to the common-ion effect.
This is fundamentally incorrect. The common-ion effect is defined as the suppression of the degree of dissociation of a weak electrolyte when a strong electrolyte containing a common ion is added.
For example, if you add CH3COONa to a solution of CH3COOH, the high concentration of acetate ions (CH3COO−) from the salt acts as an added product. According to Le-Chatelier's principle, adding a product forces the equilibrium to shift backward to consume it, thereby suppressing the dissociation of the weak acid. The common-ion effect is literally a direct application of Le-Chatelier's principle! Statement IV is False.
Since statements I, II, and III are correct, the right choice is Option (d).