Imagine you are an engineer tasked with moving a massive conductor through a magnetic field. This isn't just any magnetic field; its strength fades away exponentially as you push forward. How much power would you need to maintain a constant speed? Let's break down the physics and mathematics behind this fascinating problem.
Visualizing the 3D Setup
First, let's orient ourselves in 3D space. We have a straight conductor lying along the z-axis, stretching from z=−1.5 m to z=1.5 m. This gives it a total length of L=3.0 m. A steady current of I=10.0 A flows through it in the negative z-direction, so we can define our length vector as L=−3.0k^ m.
The entire region is permeated by a magnetic field pointing in the positive y-direction. However, its magnitude is not constant; it decays exponentially along the x-axis:
The Lorentz Force in Action
When a current-carrying wire sits in a magnetic field, it experiences a magnetic force (Lorentz force) given by the cross product:
Let's substitute our known vectors into this equation:
Fm=10×(−3.0k^)×(3.0×10−4e−0.2xj^)
Grouping the scalar terms together, we get:
Fm=−90×10−4e−0.2x(k^×j^)
Using the right-hand rule for cross products, we know that k^×j^=−i^. The two negative signs cancel out beautifully, leaving us with a force pointing purely in the positive x-direction:
The Calculus of Work
We need to move this conductor from x=0 to x=2.0 m at a constant speed. Because the magnetic force is pushing the conductor in the +x direction, an external agent would actually need to pull back to prevent it from accelerating. The magnitude of the work done during this process is the integral of the force over the displacement:
W=∫02Fm⋅dx=∫029.0×10−3e−0.2xdx
Let's evaluate this exponential integral. The antiderivative of e−0.2x is −0.2e−0.2x. Applying the limits from 0 to 2:
W=9.0×10−3[−0.2e−0.2x]02
W=−0.29.0×10−3(e−0.4−e0)
W=−45×10−3(e−0.4−1)=45×10−3(1−e−0.4) J
Power
The Final Sprint
Power is the rate at which work is done, calculated as P=tW. We are given the time t=5×10−3 s.
P=5×10−345×10−3(1−e−0.4)
The 10−3 terms cancel out perfectly, leaving:
To find the final numerical value, we evaluate e−0.4. Using standard approximations or a calculator, e−0.4≈0.6703.
P=9(1−0.6703)=9×0.3297≈2.967 W
Rounding to two decimal places, the power required is 2.97 W, which perfectly matches option (b).