Understanding the Lens Formula
To determine the correct graphical representation of the relationship between the object distance u and the image distance v for a concave lens, we must first establish the mathematical equation governing these variables. We begin with the standard lens formula:
However, the graphs provided in the options are plotted in the first quadrant, which implies we are dealing strictly with the magnitudes of these distances. To derive the relation for magnitudes, we must apply the Cartesian sign convention. For a concave lens, the object is placed in front of the lens, the virtual image is formed on the same side, and the principal focus is also on the same side. Therefore, all three quantities—object distance, image distance, and focal length—are negative.
Let's substitute −u, −v, and −f into the lens formula to represent their magnitudes:
Deriving the Magnitude Relation
Simplifying the equation by multiplying the entire expression by −1, we get:
Now, we can solve for v by taking the least common multiple (LCM) on the right-hand side:
Inverting both sides yields the explicit function for the image distance v in terms of the object distance u:
This is the master equation we need to plot. Let's analyze its behavior at key points to identify the correct graph.
Analyzing the Graph's Behavior
1. Behavior near the Origin (u→0):
Imagine placing the object extremely close to the optical center of the lens. As u approaches 0, the denominator u+f is dominated by f. Thus, the equation simplifies to:
This tells us that near the origin, the curve v(u) behaves like the straight line v=u. Geometrically, this means the curve must start at the origin (0,0) and be perfectly tangent to the reference line u=v.
2. Behavior at Infinity (u→∞):
What happens if we move the object infinitely far away? We can evaluate the limit of our function as u tends to infinity. Dividing the numerator and the denominator by u, we get:
This indicates that as the object distance increases indefinitely, the image distance approaches the focal length f but never exceeds it. Therefore, the graph must have a horizontal asymptote at v=f.
3. Checking an Intermediate Point (u=f):
To further distinguish the correct curve, let's evaluate the function exactly at the focal point, u=f:
This means the curve must pass through the coordinate (f,2f). Notice that the reference line u=v passes through (f,f). Since 2f<f, our curve lies strictly below the reference line.
Conclusion
By synthesizing our findings, we are looking for a curve that:
1. Starts at the origin and is tangent to the line u=v.
2. Stays entirely below the line u=v.
3. Passes through the point (f,2f).
4. Asymptotically approaches the horizontal line v=f as u becomes very large.
Furthermore, taking the second derivative of v with respect to u yields a negative value, confirming that the curve is concave downwards everywhere. Matching these precise mathematical characteristics with the given visual options, we find that option (b) is the only graph that flawlessly represents this physical reality.