Analyzing the Setup
Imagine a charged particle embarking on a journey through a region filled with both an electric and a magnetic field. The particle starts at point P(0,a) with an initial velocity vP=vi^. It curves through space and eventually reaches point Q(2a,0) with a new velocity vQ=−2vj^.
The environment is governed by a uniform electric field pointing to the right (E=Ei^) and a uniform magnetic field pointing out of the page (B=Bk^). Our goal is to evaluate four distinct physical statements about this journey.
The Master Equation
Work-Energy Theorem
To determine the magnitude of the electric field E, we need a bridge between the forces acting on the particle and its change in speed. The Work-Energy Theorem is the perfect tool: Wnet=ΔK.
Crucially, the magnetic force FB=q(v×B) is always perpendicular to the velocity vector. Because work is the dot product of force and displacement, a perpendicular force does zero work. Therefore, the entire change in kinetic energy is solely due to the electric field.
The work done by the uniform electric field as the particle moves from
x=0 to
x=2a is:
WE=∫PQFE⋅dr=∫02aqEdx=2qaE
The change in kinetic energy from
P to
Q is:
ΔK=21m(2v)2−21mv2=23mv2
Equating the two yields the electric field:
2qaE=23mv2⟹E=43(qamv2)
This confirms that
Statement 1 is correct.
Power and Rate of Work Done
The "rate of work done" is simply the mechanical power, defined as P=Fnet⋅v. Let's evaluate this at both points.
At Point P:
The velocity is
vP=vi^. The net force is
Fnet=qEi^+q(vi^×Bk^)=qEi^−qvBj^.
Taking the dot product:
PP=(qEi^−qvBj^)⋅(vi^)=qEv
Substituting our expression for
E:
PP=q(43qamv2)v=43(amv3)
This confirms that
Statement 2 is correct.
At Point Q:
The velocity is vQ=−2vj^. The electric force is qEi^, which is perpendicular to vQ, so its power contribution is zero. The magnetic force is always perpendicular to velocity, so its power contribution is also zero. Thus, the total rate of work done at Q is exactly zero.
This confirms that Statement 3 is correct.
The Angular Momentum Check
Finally, let's check the angular momentum, defined as L=r×p=r×mv.
At Point P:
LP=(aj^)×(mvi^)=−mvak^
The magnitude is
∣LP∣=mva.
At Point Q:
LQ=(2ai^)×(−2mvj^)=−4mvak^
The magnitude is
∣LQ∣=4mva.
The difference between these magnitudes is:
ΔL=4mva−mva=3mva
Statement 4 claims the difference is 2mav, which is mathematically false. Therefore, Statement 4 is incorrect.
Since statements 1, 2, and 3 are correct, the right choice is option (b).