The phenomenon of an object splitting or exploding into multiple fragments is a classic scenario in physics that beautifully illustrates the interplay between momentum and energy. In this problem, we are presented with a block moving at a constant velocity that suddenly splits into two equal halves. Let's embark on a detailed journey to uncover the mechanics behind this event.
Analyzing the Setup
Imagine a block of mass m gliding effortlessly across a perfectly smooth, frictionless horizontal surface at a brisk speed of 40 m/s. Suddenly, an internal mechanism causes it to split into two identical pieces, each with a mass of m/2. We are told that one of these fragments continues to move in the original direction but at an increased speed of 60 m/s. Our goal is to determine the state of the second fragment and subsequently analyze the change in the system's kinetic energy.
The key to unlocking this problem lies in understanding the nature of the forces involved. The split is caused entirely by internal forces within the block. Because the surface is smooth, there are no external horizontal forces, such as friction, acting on the system.
The Master Equation
Conservation of Momentum
According to Newton's Second Law of Motion, the rate of change of momentum of a system is directly proportional to the net external force applied to it. Since the net external horizontal force is zero (Fext=0), the total linear momentum of the system must remain constant. This is the Principle of Conservation of Linear Momentum.
Let's set up our momentum equation. The initial momentum of the system is simply the mass of the original block multiplied by its velocity:
pi=m×40
After the split, the total momentum is the vector sum of the momenta of the two individual fragments. Let the velocity of the second fragment be
v2. The final momentum is:
pf=(2m)×60+(2m)×v2
Equating the initial and final momenta, we get:
m(40)=2m(60)+2mv2
Calculating the Missing Velocity
Now, let's perform the algebraic manipulation to find
v2. We can divide the entire equation by the common mass term
m:
40=260+2v2
40=30+2v2
Subtracting
30 from both sides yields:
10=2v2
Multiplying by
2, we find the velocity of the second fragment:
v2=20 m/s
The positive sign indicates that the second fragment also continues to move in the same original direction, albeit at a slower speed than the first fragment.
The Kinetic Energy Shift
With the velocities of all parts known, we can now turn our attention to the kinetic energy of the system. Unlike momentum, kinetic energy is not necessarily conserved during an explosion or a split. In fact, the internal forces that cause the split do positive work on the fragments, converting some form of internal potential energy (like chemical or elastic energy) into additional kinetic energy.
Let's calculate the initial kinetic energy (
KEi) of the solid block:
KEi=21mu2=21m(40)2
KEi=21m(1600)=800m
Next, we calculate the final kinetic energy (
KEf), which is the sum of the kinetic energies of the two fragments:
KEf=21m1v12+21m2v22
KEf=21(2m)(60)2+21(2m)(20)2
KEf=4m(3600)+4m(400)
KEf=900m+100m=1000m
As anticipated, the final kinetic energy (1000m) is greater than the initial kinetic energy (800m). The system has gained 200m Joules of kinetic energy due to the internal work done during the split.
The Final Calculation and a Note on Terminology
The problem asks us to find the value of x given that the "fractional change in the kinetic energy will be x:4".
Strictly speaking in physics, the term "fractional change" refers to the change in a quantity divided by its initial value:
Fractional Change=KEiΔKE=KEiKEf−KEi=800m1000m−800m=800200=41
If we equate this to x/4, we would get x=1. However, the official answer key for this JEE problem states that the answer is 5. This implies that the question author intended for the phrase "fractional change" to actually mean the ratio of the final kinetic energy to the initial kinetic energy.
Let's calculate this ratio:
Ratio=KEiKEf=800m1000m=45
Equating this ratio to
x/4:
45=4x
This gives us the final answer:
x=5
A crucial takeaway for competitive exams: While precise terminology is important, you must also be adaptable. If a strict interpretation leads to an answer that doesn't align with the provided options or the expected format, consider alternative interpretations of the phrasing. In this case, recognizing that the author meant "ratio" instead of "fractional change" is key to arriving at the intended solution.