Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are observing a microscopic battle for real estate. We have a solid surface of activated charcoal acting as the host, and two different gases, sulfur dioxide (SO2) and hydrogen (H2), trying to stick or adsorb onto it.
This phenomenon is known as physical adsorption or physisorption. In physisorption, the gas molecules are held to the solid surface by weak van der Waals forces. The question asks us to compare the extent to which these two gases are adsorbed and to evaluate the reasoning behind it.
The Master Concept
Critical Temperature
To understand which gas wins the battle for the charcoal surface, we need to look closely at the molecules themselves. Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is a polar molecule with a bent geometry. Because of this polarity, it experiences relatively strong dipole-dipole interactions between its molecules.
On the other hand, hydrogen (H2) is a perfectly symmetrical, non-polar diatomic molecule. The only intermolecular forces it can muster are very weak London dispersion forces.
This brings us to a crucial thermodynamic property: Critical Temperature (Tc). The critical temperature of a gas is a direct reflection of the strength of its intermolecular forces. The stronger the forces pulling the molecules together, the higher the critical temperature. Since SO2 has much stronger intermolecular forces than H2, it naturally follows that Tc(SO2)>Tc(H2).
Connecting to Adsorption
So, what does a higher critical temperature mean for adsorption?
A higher critical temperature means that the gas is more easily liquefiable. It is already "closer" to being a liquid at room temperature compared to a gas with a low critical temperature. Because the molecules of an easily liquefiable gas already have a strong tendency to stick together, they also have a much stronger tendency to stick to the surface of an adsorbent.
Therefore, because SO2 has a higher critical temperature, it is more easily liquefiable, which directly leads to a greater extent of adsorption on the charcoal surface compared to H2.
Final Conclusion
Let's evaluate our given statements.
Assertion (A) states that SO2(g) is adsorbed to a larger extent than H2(g) on activated charcoal. Based on our analysis, this is absolutely correct.
Reason (R) states that SO2(g) has a higher critical temperature than H2(g). This is also a factual statement.
Furthermore, the higher critical temperature is the exact physical reason why SO2 is adsorbed more. Therefore, both Assertion and Reason are correct, and the Reason is the perfect, scientifically sound explanation for the Assertion.