Have you ever wondered how we can measure resistance with such incredible precision? The meter bridge is a beautiful application of the Wheatstone bridge principle, allowing us to find unknown resistances by simply sliding a jockey along a wire.
But what happens when we introduce a twist—like changing the temperature? Let's dive into this fascinating problem and unravel the physics step by step!
Analyzing the Setup
Imagine you are standing in front of a meter bridge.
In the left gap, we have a standard, known resistance R. In the right gap, we have our mysterious unknown resistance X.
When we slide the jockey and find the null point, the galvanometer shows zero deflection. This means the bridge is perfectly balanced! The wire is divided into two segments: l1 and l2.
The Master Equation
Because the bridge is balanced, the ratio of the resistances in the gaps is exactly equal to the ratio of the balancing lengths.
We can write this elegantly as:
XR=l2l1
This is our master equation. It dictates the entire behavior of the meter bridge.
The Temperature Twist
Now, the problem throws a curveball. We take the unknown resistance X and place it inside a hot enclosure.
What does heat do to a metal?
As the Reason statement correctly points out, the resistance of a metal increases with an increase in temperature. The thermal agitation of atoms makes it harder for electrons to flow.
Therefore, the value of our unknown resistance X goes up!
Maintaining the Balance
The Assertion states that we want to obtain the null point at the exact same position as before.
If the null point doesn't move, the lengths l1 and l2 remain completely unchanged.
This means the ratio on the right side of our master equation, l2l1, is a constant.
If the right side is constant, the left side must also be constant:
XR=constant
The Final Verdict
Let's look closely at this ratio. We know that the denominator, X, has increased due to the heat.
For the entire fraction XR to remain constant, the numerator R must also increase proportionally!
We need a larger standard resistance to maintain the balance at the same point.
However, the Assertion claims that we should decrease the value of the standard resistance. This is a direct contradiction to our physical deduction.
Therefore, the Assertion is completely false, while the Reason is a true statement of physics.
The correct choice is option (d). Physics is all about following the logic, and here, the logic leads us straight to the answer!