Animated Solution for Mathematics - Matrices and Determinants: Among the statements :
I: If 1cosαcosβcosα1cosγcosβcosγ1=0cosαcosβcosα0cosγcosβcosγ0, then cos2α+cos2β+cos2γ=23, and
II : If x2+x2x2+3x−1x2+2x+3x+13x2x−1x−23x−32x−1=px+q, then p2=196q2,
Select Answer:
Visualized Solution
Analyzing the Statements
We need to evaluate the truth value of two statements involving determinants.
Welcome, future engineers. Today, we are not just solving a problem; we are engaging in a duel with two distinct mathematical entities. In the world of JEE Advanced, a determinant is not merely a grid of numbers—it is a structure waiting to be unraveled.
We have two statements before us, and our mission is to determine their truth. Let us embark on this journey with precision and patience.
The Trigonometric Dance
We begin with Statement I. We are presented with two determinants, D1 and D2. At first glance, they look intimidating, filled with trigonometric functions.
We define D1 as the determinant with ones on the diagonal and cosines elsewhere. When we expand D1 along the first row, we perform a systematic decomposition. As we expand this, we see a beautiful pattern emerge:
D1=1−cos2α−cos2β−cos2γ+2cosαcosβcosγ
Now, look at D2. It is a skew-symmetric-like structure with zeros on the diagonal. Expanding this is even more satisfying because the zeros simplify our work significantly:
D2=2cosαcosβcosγ
Here is the moment of truth. The problem states D1=D2. When we equate them, the term 2cosαcosβcosγ appears on both sides and cancels out.
We are left with the elegant result: 1−cos2α−cos2β−cos2γ=0, which implies cos2α+cos2β+cos2γ=1. Statement I claims this sum is 23. Since $1
eq \frac{3}{2}$, we can confidently declare: Statement I is false.
The Polynomial Trap
Now, we turn our attention to Statement II. We have a determinant f(x) filled with polynomials in x, and we are told it equals px+q. Many students would immediately try to expand this determinant in terms of x.
Do not fall into this trap! Expanding a 3×3 determinant with polynomial entries is a recipe for a calculation error. Instead, we use the power of the 'Identity'. Since the equation holds for all x, we can choose values that make our lives easier.
First, let x=0. The term px vanishes, leaving us with q=f(0). Plugging x=0 into the matrix, we get a simple numerical determinant:
q=0−1310−1−2−3−1=−12
Next, we need p. Let x=1. This gives us p+q=f(1). Substituting x=1 into the matrix yields:
p+q=246231−101=12
Since we already know q=−12, we solve for p: p−12=12, which implies p=24.
The Final Verdict
We have our values: p=24 and q=−12. Statement II asks us to verify if p2=196q2.
Let us calculate the left side: p2=(24)2=576. Now the right side: 196q2=196(−12)2=196×144=28224.
Clearly, $576
eq 28224$. Thus, Statement II is also false.
In this problem, we learned that the most complex-looking expressions often yield to simple, strategic choices. Both statements were false, but the journey to that truth was a masterclass in algebraic strategy.