Analyzing the Setup
When you first look at the inequality (cot−1x)2−7(cot−1x)+10>0, it is natural to feel a bit overwhelmed. You see inverse trigonometric functions, squares, and a quadratic structure.
However, most complex-looking problems are just simple concepts wearing a mask. Let us perform a substitution by letting t=cot−1x.
The problem transforms into a standard quadratic inequality:
t2−7t+10>0
We factorize this expression as:
(t−2)(t−5)>0
Using the wavy curve method, we immediately see that this inequality holds true when t<2 or t>5.
The Range Trap
Where Most Students Stumble
We are not solving for
t; we are solving for
x. Substituting back, we obtain:
cot−1x<2orcot−1x>5
This is where the trap lies. Many students rush to solve for x without considering the domain and range of the inverse trigonometric functions.
Recall that the principal range of cot−1x is (0,π). Since π≈3.14, the maximum value cot−1x can ever achieve is just under 3.14.
Therefore, the condition
cot−1x>5 is physically impossible. It is a mathematical ghost, and we discard it entirely. We are left with only one valid condition:
0<cot−1x<2
The Monotonicity Masterclass
We are almost at the finish line. To isolate x, we must apply the cotangent function to all parts of the inequality 0<cot−1x<2.
Stop and think: is the cotangent function increasing or decreasing? If you visualize the graph of y=cotθ in the interval (0,π), you will see it is strictly decreasing.
This is the crucial moment. When you apply a strictly decreasing function to an inequality, the inequality signs must flip:
cot(0)>cot(cot−1x)>cot(2)
Since
cot(0) approaches
∞, we obtain:
∞>x>cot(2)
Reading this from right to left, we find x>cot(2). In interval notation, the final solution is:
(cot2,∞)