The Geometry of the Shortest Path
A Journey of Optimization
Imagine you are standing at point P(−3,4) on a coordinate plane. You have a mission: you must touch the x-axis at some point R and then proceed to your destination at Q(0,2).
You are walking at a constant speed, which means that to reach your destination in the minimum time, you must minimize the total distance traveled. This is a classic optimization challenge that has fascinated mathematicians for centuries.
Phase 1
The Reflection Principle
At first glance, you might be tempted to write down the distance formula for PR and RQ, sum them up, and dive into a messy calculus derivative. Stop! Take a breath.
In JEE Advanced, we look for elegance. We use the Reflection Principle. Imagine the x-axis is a mirror. If you look at point Q(0,2) in this mirror, you see an image, Q′(0,−2), located exactly on the other side.
Because of the symmetry of reflection, for any point R on the x-axis, the distance RQ is identical to the distance RQ′. We are no longer trying to minimize PR+RQ; we are now trying to minimize PR+RQ′.
Phase 2
The Straight Line
Why is this transformation so powerful? Because the shortest distance between any two points in a flat plane is a straight line. By reflecting Q to Q′, we have "unfolded" the path.
The path P→R→Q′ is now a single, continuous line segment. If P,R, and Q′ are collinear, the distance is minimized. We have turned a complex minimization problem into a simple task of finding the equation of a line.
Using the two-point form of a line equation,
y−y1=x2−x1y2−y1(x−x1)
We substitute our coordinates P(−3,4) and Q′(0,−2):
Simplifying this, we get y+2=−36x, which reduces beautifully to:
Phase 3
Locating the Optimal Point
Now that we have the equation of our path, finding point R is trivial. Point R lies on the x-axis, which means its y-coordinate is 0.
Setting y=0 in our equation y=−2x−2, we get 0=−2x−2, which leads us directly to x=−1. Thus, our optimal point R is (−1,0).
Phase 4
The Final Calculation
We are almost there. The problem asks for the value of 50((PR)2+(RQ)2). Let us calculate these squares.
For PR, with P(−3,4) and R(−1,0):
(PR)2=(−1−(−3))2+(0−4)2=(2)2+(−4)2=4+16=20
For RQ, with R(−1,0) and Q(0,2):
(RQ)2=(0−(−1))2+(2−0)2=(1)2+(2)2=1+4=5
Finally, we compute the expression:
The final answer is 1250. You didn't just solve a problem; you mastered a technique. Keep this "Reflection Principle" in your toolkit—it will serve you well in optics, mechanics, and beyond.