Analyzing the Geometry of the Field
Imagine you are standing on the edge of this farmer's land. We have a triangular field defined by the vertices P(0,0), Q(1,1), and R(2,0).
The base of the triangle, PR, lies perfectly along the x-axis, stretching from x=0 to x=2, giving us a base length of 2 units. The peak of the triangle is at Q(1,1), which means the height of our triangle is exactly 1 unit.
Using the fundamental formula for the area of a triangle, Area=21×base×height, we calculate:
Area=21×2×1=1 square unit
This is our baseline.
The Stolen Sliver
Now, enter the neighbor, farmer F2. They are taking a region bounded by the line segment PQ and a curve y=xn.
First, let us define the line PQ. Since it connects (0,0) and (1,1), its equation is simply y=x.
The curve y=xn (where n>1) is a classic power function. Because n>1, for any x between 0 and 1, xn will always be smaller than x. This means the curve bows downwards, creating a sliver of land trapped between the straight line y=x and the curve y=xn.
The Calculus of Encroachment
To find the area of this stolen region, we turn to the power of definite integrals. We are looking for the area between two functions, which is defined as the integral of the upper function minus the lower function over the interval of interest.
Here, our interval is from x=0 to x=1. So, the area taken by farmer F2 is:
Do not let the variable n intimidate you. We treat it just like any other constant. Applying the power rule for integration, the integral of x is 2x2, and the integral of xn is n+1xn+1.
Evaluating this from 0 to 1:
Substituting the upper limit x=1, we get 21−n+11. Substituting the lower limit x=0 yields 0, so our expression for the stolen area is simply 21−n+11.
The Final Solve
The problem gives us a crucial piece of information: this stolen area is exactly 30% of the total area of △PQR. Since the total area is 1, the stolen area must be 0.3.
Now, we set up our final algebraic equation:
To solve for n, we isolate the term with n. Subtracting 0.3 from 0.5 (which is 21), we get:
Since 0.2 is the same as 51, we have:
By comparing the denominators, it is clear that n+1=5, which leads us directly to n=4. Through the elegance of calculus and a bit of algebraic persistence, we have determined the exact nature of the curve that defined the neighbor's encroachment.